http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-no-tin-or-ein-for-a-vendor/ Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn't be. Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:16:58 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-no-tin-or-ein-for-a-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-8223 Ask the taxgirl: 1099 for Closed Business | taxgirl Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:47:51 +0000 http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-no-tin-or-ein-for-a-vendor/#comment-8223 [...] With respect to the EIN, I would mail (not fax) by certified mail and by regular mail a copy of the form W-9 to the last known mailing address, and make the request for the taxpayer ID number. If the taxpayer does not respond, I would issue the form 1099 with the word “refused” typed into the box and mail to the last known mailing address. Note that penalties may apply to both the taxpayer and the issuer. [...] [...] With respect to the EIN, I would mail (not fax) by certified mail and by regular mail a copy of the form W-9 to the last known mailing address, and make the request for the taxpayer ID number. If the taxpayer does not respond, I would issue the form 1099 with the word “refused” typed into the box and mail to the last known mailing address. Note that penalties may apply to both the taxpayer and the issuer. [...]

]]> http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-no-tin-or-ein-for-a-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-4040 Kelly Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:33:50 +0000 http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-no-tin-or-ein-for-a-vendor/#comment-4040 Thanks! Thanks!

]]> http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-no-tin-or-ein-for-a-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-4041 Kristine Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:59:06 +0000 http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-no-tin-or-ein-for-a-vendor/#comment-4041 No flak from me. I agree with your opinion to enter 'refused' or some other explanation in the EIN field, especially since there is risk of penalty to the payor. Great post! No flak from me. I agree with your opinion to enter ‘refused’ or some other explanation in the EIN field, especially since there is risk of penalty to the payor. Great post!

]]>