<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask the taxgirl:  Reporting for Single Member LLCs and S corporations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-reporting-for-single-member-llcs-and-s-corporations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-reporting-for-single-member-llcs-and-s-corporations/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn&#039;t be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-reporting-for-single-member-llcs-and-s-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-9842</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3011#comment-9842</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m fairly conservative on the S election front... It would have to be A LOT more IMO to make a real difference - esp if taxpayer has health insurance needs, Social Security issues or would require significant assistance with tax preparation.  The incentive to be an S corporation, I&#039;m sure, was related to SE tax.  The &quot;savings&quot; on those can often be offset by other costs - the point relating to local and state taxes was well taken, for example.

I just ran the numbers in Philly for a taxpayer who was grossing over $100k and the savings, with health care and other issues taken into consideration - was less than $2k.  That doesn&#039;t include the fees to file the additional returns (yes, plural because of state and local).  If the numbers come out relatively even, I think the less burdensome approach is best for most taxpayers.

I ran those same numbers for a taxpayer grossing over $250k and the story was very different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m fairly conservative on the S election front&#8230; It would have to be A LOT more IMO to make a real difference &#8211; esp if taxpayer has health insurance needs, Social Security issues or would require significant assistance with tax preparation.  The incentive to be an S corporation, I&#8217;m sure, was related to SE tax.  The &#8220;savings&#8221; on those can often be offset by other costs &#8211; the point relating to local and state taxes was well taken, for example.</p>
<p>I just ran the numbers in Philly for a taxpayer who was grossing over $100k and the savings, with health care and other issues taken into consideration &#8211; was less than $2k.  That doesn&#8217;t include the fees to file the additional returns (yes, plural because of state and local).  If the numbers come out relatively even, I think the less burdensome approach is best for most taxpayers.</p>
<p>I ran those same numbers for a taxpayer grossing over $250k and the story was very different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Kay Foss</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-reporting-for-single-member-llcs-and-s-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-9840</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Kay Foss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3011#comment-9840</guid>
		<description>The 2008 S-Corp return was due March 16, 2009. As pointed out by Vinny the S-Corp election form was due in 2008. The IRS has been allowing Form 2553 to be filed with the first S-Corp return if it wasn&#039;t filed previously and there&#039;s a good reason.

If no extension was filed for the corporation, she should file a return as soon as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2008 S-Corp return was due March 16, 2009. As pointed out by Vinny the S-Corp election form was due in 2008. The IRS has been allowing Form 2553 to be filed with the first S-Corp return if it wasn&#8217;t filed previously and there&#8217;s a good reason.</p>
<p>If no extension was filed for the corporation, she should file a return as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mc</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-reporting-for-single-member-llcs-and-s-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-9837</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3011#comment-9837</guid>
		<description>Would your advise be any different if he was making  $54,67 0? I&#039;m sure TP has aspirations of more income in the non-&quot;bad years&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would your advise be any different if he was making  $54,67 0? I&#8217;m sure TP has aspirations of more income in the non-&#8221;bad years&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-reporting-for-single-member-llcs-and-s-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-9835</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3011#comment-9835</guid>
		<description>And be sure that the 2553 (S-Corp election) was filed in addition to the 8832 (check the box) form.  I think both have to be filed within 75 days of formation if you want S corp and corp status retroactive to day 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And be sure that the 2553 (S-Corp election) was filed in addition to the 8832 (check the box) form.  I think both have to be filed within 75 days of formation if you want S corp and corp status retroactive to day 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-reporting-for-single-member-llcs-and-s-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-9823</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3011#comment-9823</guid>
		<description>Absolutely, a great point!  In fact, the state and local treatment of both LLCs and S corporations will vary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely, a great point!  In fact, the state and local treatment of both LLCs and S corporations will vary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JN</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-reporting-for-single-member-llcs-and-s-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-9821</link>
		<dc:creator>JN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3011#comment-9821</guid>
		<description>Also, not sure about the resident of the taxpayer, but some states and municipalities (hello New York City) tax S corps at the entity level, making them inefficient in at least that respect (NYC also imposes a tax on SMLLCs, but it&#039;s less than the tax on S corps).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, not sure about the resident of the taxpayer, but some states and municipalities (hello New York City) tax S corps at the entity level, making them inefficient in at least that respect (NYC also imposes a tax on SMLLCs, but it&#8217;s less than the tax on S corps).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

