<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask the taxgirl:  Temps as Employees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-temps-as-employees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-temps-as-employees/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn't be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:44:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-temps-as-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-9116</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=2727#comment-9116</guid>
		<description>Miki, I would usually agree except: 
1, I&#039;m not sure that it was a 1099 and not a W-2 as the taxpayer referenced both withholding and independent contractor status and referred to the form as a 1040 - so I&#039;m not 100% sure what was going on; and
2, taxpayer had an accountant do her taxes, who I&#039;m assuming was both qualified and could look at the totality of the circumstances, then gave it a stamp of approval.
I would definitely agree that a misclassification should be addressed.  I think what happened, since taxpayer referenced withholding is that she started out as independent contractor and employer switched to employee status.  There wouldn&#039;t generally be withholding for a 1099-MISC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miki, I would usually agree except:<br />
1, I&#8217;m not sure that it was a 1099 and not a W-2 as the taxpayer referenced both withholding and independent contractor status and referred to the form as a 1040 &#8211; so I&#8217;m not 100% sure what was going on; and<br />
2, taxpayer had an accountant do her taxes, who I&#8217;m assuming was both qualified and could look at the totality of the circumstances, then gave it a stamp of approval.<br />
I would definitely agree that a misclassification should be addressed.  I think what happened, since taxpayer referenced withholding is that she started out as independent contractor and employer switched to employee status.  There wouldn&#8217;t generally be withholding for a 1099-MISC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miki</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/ask-the-taxgirl-temps-as-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-9115</link>
		<dc:creator>miki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=2727#comment-9115</guid>
		<description>I disagree. If the taxpayer was an employer, and got a 1040 MISC, they should take it to the employer and have the employer correct it and issue a W-2. 

Otherwise, the taxpayer is out the 1/2 self-employment tax (which the employer would have paid as their share of the FICA tax).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. If the taxpayer was an employer, and got a 1040 MISC, they should take it to the employer and have the employer correct it and issue a W-2. </p>
<p>Otherwise, the taxpayer is out the 1/2 self-employment tax (which the employer would have paid as their share of the FICA tax).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
