<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can IRS Save The Press?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/can-irs-save-the-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/can-irs-save-the-press/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn&#039;t be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:02:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huma</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/can-irs-save-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-9867</link>
		<dc:creator>Huma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3019#comment-9867</guid>
		<description>FOX News told me they do. =/

Hah. 

But yeah, it&#039;s a good point. Even though the non-profit status would take away the power of endorsements, there would be many ways to get around that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOX News told me they do. =/</p>
<p>Hah. </p>
<p>But yeah, it&#8217;s a good point. Even though the non-profit status would take away the power of endorsements, there would be many ways to get around that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TaxRascal</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/can-irs-save-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-9866</link>
		<dc:creator>TaxRascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3019#comment-9866</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I’m sure, but if they’re going to take such a drastic step, I figure the situation will be pretty closely monitored and any missteps will be taken care of.&lt;/em&gt;

Has that ever happened, in the history of government? Are there any government news sources that represent the interests of tax-payers over those of tax-spenders?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I’m sure, but if they’re going to take such a drastic step, I figure the situation will be pretty closely monitored and any missteps will be taken care of.</em></p>
<p>Has that ever happened, in the history of government? Are there any government news sources that represent the interests of tax-payers over those of tax-spenders?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huma</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/can-irs-save-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-9865</link>
		<dc:creator>Huma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3019#comment-9865</guid>
		<description>But if newspapers get nonprofit status, they wouldn&#039;t be allowed to make endorsements, just report on political campaigns. There would be ways around it for the clever writer, I&#039;m sure, but if they&#039;re going to take such a drastic step, I figure the situation will be pretty closely monitored and any missteps will be taken care of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if newspapers get nonprofit status, they wouldn&#8217;t be allowed to make endorsements, just report on political campaigns. There would be ways around it for the clever writer, I&#8217;m sure, but if they&#8217;re going to take such a drastic step, I figure the situation will be pretty closely monitored and any missteps will be taken care of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TaxRascal</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/can-irs-save-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-9864</link>
		<dc:creator>TaxRascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3019#comment-9864</guid>
		<description>Sounds like it could create a nasty feedback loop: the print media, which many people rely on for information about politics, could be beholden to politicians. That might lead to cartel-like behavior: in a close race, the newspaper strongly endorses a candidate who is going to raise their funding.

Since older people are more likely to read the paper, and more likely to vote, that could be a very powerful tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like it could create a nasty feedback loop: the print media, which many people rely on for information about politics, could be beholden to politicians. That might lead to cartel-like behavior: in a close race, the newspaper strongly endorses a candidate who is going to raise their funding.</p>
<p>Since older people are more likely to read the paper, and more likely to vote, that could be a very powerful tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Tax Geek, CPA</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/can-irs-save-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-9846</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Tax Geek, CPA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3019#comment-9846</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea, but I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s the answer.  Anyway, they&#039;re already nonprofit, whether intentionally or not (tax joke...)  Here in Seattle, the PI who just quit publishing hard copies is so blatantly liberal they&#039;d definitely struggle with the restrictions.   OTOH, if it meant better quality reporting and less advertorial&#039;s it could be a good thing.  But, other then the break on FUTA, as I understand it most newspapers aren&#039;t going out of business due to their federal income tax liabilities - they don&#039;t have any, because they have no income.  The problem is cash flow, and the problem there is they aren&#039;t attracting subscribers and advertisers in sufficient numbers to support their business.   Fixing that will take more substantial changes then just becoming tax exempt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea, but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s the answer.  Anyway, they&#8217;re already nonprofit, whether intentionally or not (tax joke&#8230;)  Here in Seattle, the PI who just quit publishing hard copies is so blatantly liberal they&#8217;d definitely struggle with the restrictions.   OTOH, if it meant better quality reporting and less advertorial&#8217;s it could be a good thing.  But, other then the break on FUTA, as I understand it most newspapers aren&#8217;t going out of business due to their federal income tax liabilities &#8211; they don&#8217;t have any, because they have no income.  The problem is cash flow, and the problem there is they aren&#8217;t attracting subscribers and advertisers in sufficient numbers to support their business.   Fixing that will take more substantial changes then just becoming tax exempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huma</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/can-irs-save-the-press/comment-page-1/#comment-9843</link>
		<dc:creator>Huma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3019#comment-9843</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d support the Naperville Sun, definitely. Heck, I even follow them on Twitter! :-P But to kind of sum up what I said in my own blog post about this (http://bit.ly/xASyG), even paying full price every single day for a daily paper in addition to tax deductions and nonprofit status wouldn&#039;t do much to cover operating costs considering just how much $$ papers get from advertisers, advertisers that would most likely back out if the paper started failing so as to require contributions from the local public. Le&#039;sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d support the Naperville Sun, definitely. Heck, I even follow them on Twitter! <img src='http://www.taxgirl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' />  But to kind of sum up what I said in my own blog post about this (<a href="http://bit.ly/xASyG" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/xASyG</a>), even paying full price every single day for a daily paper in addition to tax deductions and nonprofit status wouldn&#8217;t do much to cover operating costs considering just how much $$ papers get from advertisers, advertisers that would most likely back out if the paper started failing so as to require contributions from the local public. Le&#8217;sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

