The Dutch are well known for Delft pottery, wooden shoes, legalized prostitution and windmills. Perhaps not surprisingly, many of those things haven’t caught on in all areas of the world (oh c’mon, tell me that you have a pair of wooden shoes in your closet).
I have a feeling that list of things that aren’t spreading like wild fire is about to grow…
Effective in 2012, Dutch drivers will be monitored by GPS and will pay taxes on a per-kilometers-driven basis. For the average passenger car, the rate will be about € 0.03 per kilometer (or roughly $.07 US per mile). Drivers of trucks, commercial vehicles and less fuel efficient cars will pay more. Public transit and cabs will be exempt from the tax.
Additionally, the cost will increase for drivers at peak times.
How will it work? GPS will track the time, hour and place each car moves and send the information to a billing agency. The billing agency will deduct the taxes directly from drivers’ accounts.
If it works as anticipated, the Dutch government estimates that traffic will drop by 15% – and rush hour traffic will drop by 50%. Minister of Transportation Camiel Eurlings believes that carbon emissions will be cut in half.
Interestingly, the law will abolish current road taxes and sales taxes for cars. The final numbers should work out so that 6 out of 10 drivers are better off under the new scheme and reportedly, tax revenue will remain the same.
According to the German newspaper, Deutsche Welle, the tax will increase every year until 2018.
The news has stirred interest in nearby Germany with top German automotive expert Ferdinand Dudenhoeffer saying that Germany should “take the progressive (Dutch) model as an example.” Interesting for sure. But there’s one or two (or three or four or five) obstacles: namely Audi, BMW, Mercedes, Porsche and Volkswagen. Long considered an automaker’s paradise, Germany tends to be known for heavier, more luxurious, power cars – not so much the cheaper, smaller more efficient cars encouraged under the Dutch scheme. With that in mind, in a tough economy, Germany is highly unlikely to adopt a policy which might negatively affect the car industry any time soon.
But that doesn’t mean that it’s not on the radar of other countries. Singapore already utilizes Electronic Road Pricing, a pay-per-use principle, and in the UK, there is a congestion charge for some drivers in the designated Congestion Charge Zone (CCZ). Which makes you wonder… Which country, if any, will be next?
Technorati Tags:
Netherlands, Ferdinand Dudenhoeffer, Germany, auto industry, price per kilometer, auto tax
If you ask a Mainer about taxes, you’re liable to get an earful: Mainers have one of the highest tax burdens in the nation. Nonetheless, on election day, Maine voters turned down proposals to cut taxes.
In a slow economy, Maine voters were leery of a proposal that would result in cuts in services. The controversial ballot issue, Question 4, asked voters if they wanted to limit future increases in state and local government spending and taxes to the rate of inflation plus population growth. The measure was known as the Taxpayer Bill of Rights campaign, or TABOR. Those opposed to the measure referred to it as “TABOR II” since a similar proposal was turned down in 2006.
Those in support of TABOR claimed that the bill would put more money back in taxpayer’s pockets. Critics wondered what the actual result of would be, as many state and local services were already facing cuts. Public schools are already operating under frozen budgets.
Voters also rejected a proposal to cut excise taxes on some vehicles and exempt hybrid and fuel-efficient vehicles from sales tax. Measures to encourage the purchase of cleaner cars are popular in states like Colorado but critics feared that tax cuts would have to be made up somewhere else. In that way, it wasn’t so much a tax cut as a shift in taxation.
While tax measures on the ballots were overshadowed by publicity over questions about making medical marijuana more available (yes) and gay marriage legal (no), the tax votes may be indicative of the mood of the nation on the eve of a huge election year… Only time will tell.
What challenges are the IRS facing this year? Apparently not the complexity of the Tax Code.
The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) released its perspective two weeks ago on the most serious management and performance challenges confronting the IRS. The top 10 challenges in order of priority are:
- Modernization;
- Security;
- Tax Compliance Initiatives;
- Implementing Tax Law Changes;
- Providing Quality Taxpayer Service Operations;
- Human Capital;
- Erroneous and Improper Payments and Credits;
- Globalization;
- Taxpayer Protection and Rights; and
- Leveraging Data to Improve Program Effectiveness and Reduce Costs.
In TIGTA’s twelve page memo (downloadable here as a pdf), the agency offers an assessment of the major IRS management challenge areas for fiscal year 2010.
“Complexity of the Tax Law” did not appear on this year’s list of challenges. TIGTA felt that the IRS had bigger fish to fry.
Not surprisingly, TIGTA found that many of the IRS Modernization Project milestones were “significantly over budget” and “significantly behind schedule.” That would explain why it ranks first on the list of challenges faced by IRS.
Also a top challenge? Taxpayer data security. Identity theft is a growing concern as more and more taxpayer data is stored in IRS computer systems and transmitted online. The IRS has demonstrated, through internal audits, that there are concerns with respect to both accessing private data and the stability of the data at IRS sites. Additionally, phishing and other targeted taxpayer scams are on the rise, which is an area of serious concern.
Another challenge worth noting: taxpayers with international activities. It’s no surprise to see this on the list considering the emphasis that the current administration is putting on offshore accounts. As US revenues shrink, US corporate revenues abroad are growing. In fact, TIGTA reports that US-based corporations more than tripled their foreign profits between 1994 and 2004, from $89 billion to $298 billion. Yet, considerably more than half of those profits were earned in low-tax or no-tax jurisdictions. Tracking that income is a serious concern to the acting Commish.
It’s always interesting to see what shows up on the list as top tax concerns. It often serves as a heads up to targeted enforcement practices and other shifts in policy. However, I have to say, this go around, I still can’t wrap my head around tax complexity not remaining a top issue. It’s a huge issue. Maybe the bigger problem is that we’ve become nearly apathetic to the cause. Perhaps it’s so complex that we don’t even think about it anymore? Kind of how we don’t even blink when we hear the word “billion” nowadays. The Code is not becoming less complex, maybe we’re just getting used to it.
Times are tough in Chicago. You can only tax the citizenry so much – and Chicago already shares the distinction of being one of the most taxed cities in America.
The solution? Enforcement. No big surprise there.
But enforcement costs money. What if you could get your enforcement for free? What if… you could convince taxpayers to rat each other out? Brilliant. And so, Chicago Mayor Daley has introduced a “Tax Whistleblower Program” for 2010.
The program would reward taxpayers who turn in those with unpaid business taxes. Taxpayers who successfully bring in money to the city would receive a percentage as blood money bounty.
A good way to destroy the competition, perhaps? The Revenue Department is counting on it. Ed Walsh, a Revenue spokesperson says: “It would probably be … a business knowing that a competitor is not remitting a tax. An employee [of the tax-dodging business] could know that, too. Typically, you need to provide some type of incentive.”
Nice.
This way, all businesses in Chicago could live in fear of their competition – and their neighbors. But a little fear is healthy, right?
Who knows if other cities will follow suit? I’m setting up my telescope, just in case…
