<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dave Barry Runs for President, Tax Plan Is Surprisingly Simple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/dave-barry-runs-for-president-tax-plan-is-surprisingly-simple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/dave-barry-runs-for-president-tax-plan-is-surprisingly-simple/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn't be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:33:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/dave-barry-runs-for-president-tax-plan-is-surprisingly-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-4670</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/dave-barry-runs-for-president-tax-plan-is-surprisingly-simple/#comment-4670</guid>
		<description>Must have been a slow news day. I guess covering the REAL non-mainstream candidates would be asking too much from the CNN. I realize that these filler pieces are necessary, but it&#039;s somewhat insulting to candidates who are actually running but can&#039;t even get their named mentioned on the air.

Also, at what point do the candidate&#039;s positions actually become the headlines of the news. Instead, 80% of the coverage is where so-and-so went, who so-and-so talked to today, and the latest gaffe or gossip. In 6-months or even 24 hours from now, is any of that even relevant?

Sadly, there is no relief on the horizon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must have been a slow news day. I guess covering the REAL non-mainstream candidates would be asking too much from the CNN. I realize that these filler pieces are necessary, but it&#8217;s somewhat insulting to candidates who are actually running but can&#8217;t even get their named mentioned on the air.</p>
<p>Also, at what point do the candidate&#8217;s positions actually become the headlines of the news. Instead, 80% of the coverage is where so-and-so went, who so-and-so talked to today, and the latest gaffe or gossip. In 6-months or even 24 hours from now, is any of that even relevant?</p>
<p>Sadly, there is no relief on the horizon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
