<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election Results:  State Tax Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/election-results-state-tax-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/election-results-state-tax-legislation/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn't be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:33:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/election-results-state-tax-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-7188</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1764#comment-7188</guid>
		<description>Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Safe Real Estate Info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Election Results: State Tax Legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/election-results-state-tax-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-7187</link>
		<dc:creator>Safe Real Estate Info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Election Results: State Tax Legislation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1764#comment-7187</guid>
		<description>[...] Kelly wrote an interesting post today onElection Results: State Tax LegislationHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIn Colorado: Voters said no on several tax measures, including a state sales tax increase. Amendment 58, which would end a property tax credit for Colorado’s oil and gas industry and boost severance tax revenue by $321 million a year &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kelly wrote an interesting post today onElection Results: State Tax LegislationHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIn Colorado: Voters said no on several tax measures, including a state sales tax increase. Amendment 58, which would end a property tax credit for Colorado’s oil and gas industry and boost severance tax revenue by $321 million a year &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oxnate</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/election-results-state-tax-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-7186</link>
		<dc:creator>Oxnate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1764#comment-7186</guid>
		<description>In Minnesota:  

Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment

&quot;Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to dedicate funding to protect our drinking water sources; to protect, enhance, and restore our wetlands, prairies, forests, and fish, game, and wildlife habitat; to preserve our arts and cultural heritage; to support our parks and trails; and to protect, enhance, and restore our lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater by increasing the sales and use tax rate beginning July 1, 2009, by three-eighths of one percent on taxable sales until the year 2034?&quot;

with 95% reporting it looks like it will pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Minnesota:  </p>
<p>Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment</p>
<p>&#8220;Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to dedicate funding to protect our drinking water sources; to protect, enhance, and restore our wetlands, prairies, forests, and fish, game, and wildlife habitat; to preserve our arts and cultural heritage; to support our parks and trails; and to protect, enhance, and restore our lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater by increasing the sales and use tax rate beginning July 1, 2009, by three-eighths of one percent on taxable sales until the year 2034?&#8221;</p>
<p>with 95% reporting it looks like it will pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
