<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elizabeth Garrett Says No To Top Tax Job</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/elizabeth-garrett-says-no-to-top-tax-job/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/elizabeth-garrett-says-no-to-top-tax-job/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn&#039;t be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/elizabeth-garrett-says-no-to-top-tax-job/comment-page-1/#comment-25034</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3425#comment-25034</guid>
		<description>I attended the University of Oklahoma with Beth Garret.  I had the pleasure (displasure at that time) of taking a class with her: American Renaissance Literature.  I always viewed her as a conservative, myopic sorority girl (I believe Chi Omeega) during our time at OU.  She was deeply involved in Student Congress in a leadership capacity.  She was also a great public speaker, with such clear and distinct diction.  Because of my opinion of her, I never initiated any dialogue with her, not even a &quot;hello,&quot; even when we sat next to each other on one occasion in class.  I must say, in retrospect, she was quite impressive then, and is even more impressive in her accomplishments now,  Most recently, she was appointed the Provost at USC.  I would not be surprised is she takes over the helm as president of OU once Boren leaves.  If not that, don&#039;t be surprised if her name comes up as apotential nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attended the University of Oklahoma with Beth Garret.  I had the pleasure (displasure at that time) of taking a class with her: American Renaissance Literature.  I always viewed her as a conservative, myopic sorority girl (I believe Chi Omeega) during our time at OU.  She was deeply involved in Student Congress in a leadership capacity.  She was also a great public speaker, with such clear and distinct diction.  Because of my opinion of her, I never initiated any dialogue with her, not even a &#8220;hello,&#8221; even when we sat next to each other on one occasion in class.  I must say, in retrospect, she was quite impressive then, and is even more impressive in her accomplishments now,  Most recently, she was appointed the Provost at USC.  I would not be surprised is she takes over the helm as president of OU once Boren leaves.  If not that, don&#8217;t be surprised if her name comes up as apotential nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/elizabeth-garrett-says-no-to-top-tax-job/comment-page-1/#comment-10695</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3425#comment-10695</guid>
		<description>Beth Garrett is one of the brightest people I know. I have had the extreme honor and pleasure of working with her at USC. This is a sad day for our country, because she truly is someone we could have looked to and respected in the Treasury. I guess the good news - she will be coming back to USC. Loss for the US is definetely our gain!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth Garrett is one of the brightest people I know. I have had the extreme honor and pleasure of working with her at USC. This is a sad day for our country, because she truly is someone we could have looked to and respected in the Treasury. I guess the good news &#8211; she will be coming back to USC. Loss for the US is definetely our gain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david gibson</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/elizabeth-garrett-says-no-to-top-tax-job/comment-page-1/#comment-10608</link>
		<dc:creator>david gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3425#comment-10608</guid>
		<description>Beth Garrett is brave and brilliant--If she says she&#039;s reconsidering because of aspects of her personal family situation, I take her at her word. She &lt;i&gt;has&lt;/i&gt; the mettle, and the creativity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth Garrett is brave and brilliant&#8211;If she says she&#8217;s reconsidering because of aspects of her personal family situation, I take her at her word. She <i>has</i> the mettle, and the creativity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Brannon</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/elizabeth-garrett-says-no-to-top-tax-job/comment-page-1/#comment-10530</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Brannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3425#comment-10530</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my honest take. If Garrett is taking a pass because it&#039;s going to be a hard, uncomfortable and unsavory confirmation process then she&#039;s not the person for the job. It seems that during the last seven months the rules of politics and public service have been re-written. Nothing is supposed to be questioned, debated, or undressed in the public square. Bi-partisanship is the only acceptable form of public discourse.

What? Partisanship is what makes a republic work. Tough confirmation hearings (are you listening SCOTUS nominees?) insure the best, brightest and hopefully most trustworthy individuals are appointed. As the saying goes, if you can&#039;t take the heat, stay out of the kitchen. Garrett doesn&#039;t appear to have the mettle to make a difference in such an important position and it&#039;s better to find that out before she sits down behind the tax policy desk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my honest take. If Garrett is taking a pass because it&#8217;s going to be a hard, uncomfortable and unsavory confirmation process then she&#8217;s not the person for the job. It seems that during the last seven months the rules of politics and public service have been re-written. Nothing is supposed to be questioned, debated, or undressed in the public square. Bi-partisanship is the only acceptable form of public discourse.</p>
<p>What? Partisanship is what makes a republic work. Tough confirmation hearings (are you listening SCOTUS nominees?) insure the best, brightest and hopefully most trustworthy individuals are appointed. As the saying goes, if you can&#8217;t take the heat, stay out of the kitchen. Garrett doesn&#8217;t appear to have the mettle to make a difference in such an important position and it&#8217;s better to find that out before she sits down behind the tax policy desk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garagefather</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/elizabeth-garrett-says-no-to-top-tax-job/comment-page-1/#comment-10529</link>
		<dc:creator>garagefather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3425#comment-10529</guid>
		<description>If she hasn&#039;t avoided paying her taxes in some way, she does not qualify to be in the Obama administration. He usually prefers tax cheats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If she hasn&#8217;t avoided paying her taxes in some way, she does not qualify to be in the Obama administration. He usually prefers tax cheats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Brannon</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/elizabeth-garrett-says-no-to-top-tax-job/comment-page-1/#comment-10506</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Brannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3425#comment-10506</guid>
		<description>But on the bright side if she DID decide to throw her hat in the ring she need not worry about any prior personal tax snafus. The requirement to have a clean compliance record appears to have been temporarily suspended by the Obama administration and the Senate. Confirmation may be grueling, but if the Treasury Secretary can get the job with a set of facts that sends others to jail it&#039;s hard to imagine what it takes to NOT get confirmed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But on the bright side if she DID decide to throw her hat in the ring she need not worry about any prior personal tax snafus. The requirement to have a clean compliance record appears to have been temporarily suspended by the Obama administration and the Senate. Confirmation may be grueling, but if the Treasury Secretary can get the job with a set of facts that sends others to jail it&#8217;s hard to imagine what it takes to NOT get confirmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

