<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Estate Tax Repeal, Take Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/estate-tax-repeal-take-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/estate-tax-repeal-take-two/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn't be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:17:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/estate-tax-repeal-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-12975</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taxgirl.com/?p=89#comment-12975</guid>
		<description>I must be missing something. Maybe it&#039;s my demented thought process. When this law was enacted, I was amazed our tax system had degraded to the point that we may need tax planning on which year is best for &quot;pulling the plug&quot;. Does this seem to be over the top? I&#039;ve seen little discussion on this; probably because this was supposed to change before the end of 2010. However, it hasn&#039;t so far. Suppose it doesn&#039;t change. If I had a taxable estate, was in poor health, and cared how much more I could leave to my loved ones by passing in 2010 instead of waiting, the timing of my death for tax purposes just might become a critical part of my estate plan. Conversely, suppose the heirs of a large estate foresee the millions that would evaporate if death occurred after 2010. Could this foster some interesting &quot;whodunits&quot;? Is that sick? Perhaps; but isn&#039;t it just as sick to enact tax laws that can make those scenarios possible? Congress really needs to fix this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must be missing something. Maybe it&#8217;s my demented thought process. When this law was enacted, I was amazed our tax system had degraded to the point that we may need tax planning on which year is best for &#8220;pulling the plug&#8221;. Does this seem to be over the top? I&#8217;ve seen little discussion on this; probably because this was supposed to change before the end of 2010. However, it hasn&#8217;t so far. Suppose it doesn&#8217;t change. If I had a taxable estate, was in poor health, and cared how much more I could leave to my loved ones by passing in 2010 instead of waiting, the timing of my death for tax purposes just might become a critical part of my estate plan. Conversely, suppose the heirs of a large estate foresee the millions that would evaporate if death occurred after 2010. Could this foster some interesting &#8220;whodunits&#8221;? Is that sick? Perhaps; but isn&#8217;t it just as sick to enact tax laws that can make those scenarios possible? Congress really needs to fix this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
