http://www.taxgirl.com/house-votes-to-repeal-big-oil-tax-cuts/ Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn't be. Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:16:58 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://www.taxgirl.com/house-votes-to-repeal-big-oil-tax-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-6127 fdonovan Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:10:20 +0000 http://www.taxgirl.com/house-votes-to-repeal-big-oil-tax-cuts/#comment-6127 Big Oil is not in business to consider the interests of the lowly taxpayer/gas customer but rather the shareholder of whatever nation or interest. Wouldn't it seem reasonable for B.O. to ask their shareholders to reinvigorate their strained cash flow? Such opinions are hard to grasp among those who stonewall Exxon's Valdez settlement and can't be bothered with explaining retirement packages of four hundred million ($400,000,000) to those in question. Big Oil is not in business to consider the interests of the lowly taxpayer/gas customer but rather the shareholder of whatever nation or interest. Wouldn’t it seem reasonable for B.O. to ask their shareholders to reinvigorate their strained cash flow? Such opinions are hard to grasp among those who stonewall Exxon’s Valdez settlement and can’t be bothered with explaining retirement packages of four hundred million ($400,000,000) to those in question.

]]> http://www.taxgirl.com/house-votes-to-repeal-big-oil-tax-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-6126 fdonovan Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:08:18 +0000 http://www.taxgirl.com/house-votes-to-repeal-big-oil-tax-cuts/#comment-6126 Big Oil is not in business to consider the interests of the lowly taxpayer/gas customer but rather the shareholder of whatever nation or interest. Wouldn't it seem reasonable for B.O. to ask their shareholders to reinvigorate their strained cash flow? Such opinions are hard to grasp among those who stonewall Exxon's Valdez settlement and can't be bothered with explaining retirement packages of four hundred million tax packages($400,000,000) to those in question. Big Oil is not in business to consider the interests of the lowly taxpayer/gas customer but rather the shareholder of whatever nation or interest. Wouldn’t it seem reasonable for B.O. to ask their shareholders to reinvigorate their strained cash flow? Such opinions are hard to grasp among those who stonewall Exxon’s Valdez settlement and can’t be bothered with explaining retirement packages of four hundred million tax packages($400,000,000) to those in question.

]]>