<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Amazon.com Playing Favorites?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/is-amazon-com-playing-favorites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/is-amazon-com-playing-favorites/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn&#039;t be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Little Man &#124; taxgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/is-amazon-com-playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-25381</link>
		<dc:creator>The Little Man &#124; taxgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 01:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3569#comment-25381</guid>
		<description>[...] been a lot of discussion on the blog about Amazon.com, internet sales tax and big box stores. Over the weekend, a reader sent me the link to this old [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been a lot of discussion on the blog about Amazon.com, internet sales tax and big box stores. Over the weekend, a reader sent me the link to this old [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon Does Cayce: Will Porn Keep the Online Giant Out of SC? &#124; taxgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/is-amazon-com-playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-25317</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon Does Cayce: Will Porn Keep the Online Giant Out of SC? &#124; taxgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3569#comment-25317</guid>
		<description>[...] If you&#8217;ve been following along, you know that Amazon.com has been making noise in several states, including South Carolina&#8217;s immediate neighbor to the north, my home state of North Carolina, about sales tax on internet sales. Usually, the company makes some creative argument as to why they should not have to remit sales tax. And in most cases, they lose that argument. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you&#8217;ve been following along, you know that Amazon.com has been making noise in several states, including South Carolina&#8217;s immediate neighbor to the north, my home state of North Carolina, about sales tax on internet sales. Usually, the company makes some creative argument as to why they should not have to remit sales tax. And in most cases, they lose that argument. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NC v. Amazon: Round Two &#124; taxgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/is-amazon-com-playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-15942</link>
		<dc:creator>NC v. Amazon: Round Two &#124; taxgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3569#comment-15942</guid>
		<description>[...] blogged last year that Amazon.com was picking a fight with the Tarheel State by notifying its affiliates that it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogged last year that Amazon.com was picking a fight with the Tarheel State by notifying its affiliates that it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/is-amazon-com-playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-10823</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3569#comment-10823</guid>
		<description>Amazon has a very strange attitude when it comes to taxes. In addition to all this drama with their affiliates, they&#039;ve had a longstanding policy to refuse to collect the applicable sales tax for people like myself who sell used books and other merchandise through their site. They are after all, the ones collecting the payment on such sales, and could easily pass along the charge to us as sellers. Instead however, we sellers are forced to pay the taxes out of our profits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon has a very strange attitude when it comes to taxes. In addition to all this drama with their affiliates, they&#8217;ve had a longstanding policy to refuse to collect the applicable sales tax for people like myself who sell used books and other merchandise through their site. They are after all, the ones collecting the payment on such sales, and could easily pass along the charge to us as sellers. Instead however, we sellers are forced to pay the taxes out of our profits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim W.</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/is-amazon-com-playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-10822</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3569#comment-10822</guid>
		<description>My wife and I live in DC, and have been paying a &quot;Consumer Use Tax&quot; for the past decade.  It applies the 5.75% DC sales tax rate to purchases made online and shipped to us from entities that lack a bricks-and-mortar presence in the District.  It excludes shipping costs, when itemized.  Our yearly bite is about $150, mostly from the purchase of clothing, media and electronics not widely available in local stores.  The problem is that likely less than one percent of households file and pay this tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I live in DC, and have been paying a &#8220;Consumer Use Tax&#8221; for the past decade.  It applies the 5.75% DC sales tax rate to purchases made online and shipped to us from entities that lack a bricks-and-mortar presence in the District.  It excludes shipping costs, when itemized.  Our yearly bite is about $150, mostly from the purchase of clothing, media and electronics not widely available in local stores.  The problem is that likely less than one percent of households file and pay this tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/is-amazon-com-playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-10820</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3569#comment-10820</guid>
		<description>Robert,

I completely agree with you re the referral fees. It&#039;s a win, win for Amazon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>I completely agree with you re the referral fees. It&#8217;s a win, win for Amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Pecom</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/is-amazon-com-playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-10819</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Pecom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3569#comment-10819</guid>
		<description>Amazon seems to be picking the smaller states to set the stage for their big fights with the larger, more profitable states.  The affiliate seller program was a great boost, but where will those consumers now go to shop for their goods? - directly to the amazon site, no referral fees to be paid.  Seems like a good plan for Amazon.

The director of Sales tax at Amazon, Richard Prem, has been very active in the SST.  He knew this was coming, but I don&#039;t think he could stop the storm of states looking for additional revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon seems to be picking the smaller states to set the stage for their big fights with the larger, more profitable states.  The affiliate seller program was a great boost, but where will those consumers now go to shop for their goods? &#8211; directly to the amazon site, no referral fees to be paid.  Seems like a good plan for Amazon.</p>
<p>The director of Sales tax at Amazon, Richard Prem, has been very active in the SST.  He knew this was coming, but I don&#8217;t think he could stop the storm of states looking for additional revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

