<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Phony Tax Emails&#8230; It Must Be Election Season!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/more-phony-tax-emails-it-must-be-election-season/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-phony-tax-emails-it-must-be-election-season/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn't be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:16:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-phony-tax-emails-it-must-be-election-season/comment-page-1/#comment-4422</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/more-phony-tax-emails-it-must-be-election-season/#comment-4422</guid>
		<description>I, too get a lot of those goofy e-mails. Although very conservative when it comes to government, I am very annoyed to receive that junk. The overall message seems to be, &quot;It was generated by conservative interests, so it has to be true!&quot;, so recipients just blindly keep it going. That kind of you-know-what doesn&#039;t further anyone&#039;s cause and I&#039;m very disappointed that conservatives who claim to promote truth as one of their virtues would resort to such embellishments, editing, and downright lies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too get a lot of those goofy e-mails. Although very conservative when it comes to government, I am very annoyed to receive that junk. The overall message seems to be, &#8220;It was generated by conservative interests, so it has to be true!&#8221;, so recipients just blindly keep it going. That kind of you-know-what doesn&#8217;t further anyone&#8217;s cause and I&#8217;m very disappointed that conservatives who claim to promote truth as one of their virtues would resort to such embellishments, editing, and downright lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-phony-tax-emails-it-must-be-election-season/comment-page-1/#comment-4423</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/more-phony-tax-emails-it-must-be-election-season/#comment-4423</guid>
		<description>I rely on Factcheck.org as a reliable source, but something looks odd about the Wachovia response.  I think its weird that a big corporation would mention the employee&#039;s name and that he&#039;s been &quot;dealt&quot; with.  Also thats a pretty generic job title of &quot;assistant branch manager&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rely on Factcheck.org as a reliable source, but something looks odd about the Wachovia response.  I think its weird that a big corporation would mention the employee&#8217;s name and that he&#8217;s been &#8220;dealt&#8221; with.  Also thats a pretty generic job title of &#8220;assistant branch manager&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-phony-tax-emails-it-must-be-election-season/comment-page-1/#comment-4424</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/more-phony-tax-emails-it-must-be-election-season/#comment-4424</guid>
		<description>I too recently received a frivolous email very similar to this one.  As a retired CPA (and former Internal Revenue Agent) I was immediately aware that it was bogus.  Fatcheck.org is an excellent source of information -- thank you Kelly, for helping to debunk this ridiculous spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too recently received a frivolous email very similar to this one.  As a retired CPA (and former Internal Revenue Agent) I was immediately aware that it was bogus.  Fatcheck.org is an excellent source of information &#8212; thank you Kelly, for helping to debunk this ridiculous spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
