<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Sunday Mailbag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/more-sunday-mailbag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-sunday-mailbag/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn&#039;t be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:02:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-sunday-mailbag/comment-page-1/#comment-12658</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=4224#comment-12658</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by taxgirl: More Sunday mailbag:  http://bit.ly/1tdJSf...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by taxgirl: More Sunday mailbag:  <a href="http://bit.ly/1tdJSf.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1tdJSf..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary O'Keeffe</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-sunday-mailbag/comment-page-1/#comment-12656</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary O'Keeffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=4224#comment-12656</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification, Kelly.  There was absolutely no way President Reagan and Congress could have totally and abruptly eliminated the mortgage interest deduction in 1986.  

A sudden and total end to the mortgage interest deduction would have been a disaster for many families who had recently bought homes in the early 1980s, because interest rates were so high back then, thanks to inflation.  I still remember the first time my husband and I considered buying a house, in 1981.  I called a few local banks to inquire about mortgage rates.  Fixed rate mortgages were running as high as 18%.  Shortly afterwards, there was an explosion of teaser one-year adjustables, but even they were in the low to mid teens.  I never thought I&#039;d lived to see the day when fixed rate mortgages would fall back to the levels we&#039;ve seen in recent years!

Politically, especially given the strength and power of the real estate/construction industry, I do not think Reagan could have accomplished as much as he did without agreeing to preserve the tax breaks for homeowners.   It&#039;s timely to reflect on that industry&#039;s power and influence as we look at the current debate over the extension of the temporary tax credit for home purchases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification, Kelly.  There was absolutely no way President Reagan and Congress could have totally and abruptly eliminated the mortgage interest deduction in 1986.  </p>
<p>A sudden and total end to the mortgage interest deduction would have been a disaster for many families who had recently bought homes in the early 1980s, because interest rates were so high back then, thanks to inflation.  I still remember the first time my husband and I considered buying a house, in 1981.  I called a few local banks to inquire about mortgage rates.  Fixed rate mortgages were running as high as 18%.  Shortly afterwards, there was an explosion of teaser one-year adjustables, but even they were in the low to mid teens.  I never thought I&#8217;d lived to see the day when fixed rate mortgages would fall back to the levels we&#8217;ve seen in recent years!</p>
<p>Politically, especially given the strength and power of the real estate/construction industry, I do not think Reagan could have accomplished as much as he did without agreeing to preserve the tax breaks for homeowners.   It&#8217;s timely to reflect on that industry&#8217;s power and influence as we look at the current debate over the extension of the temporary tax credit for home purchases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-sunday-mailbag/comment-page-1/#comment-12655</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=4224#comment-12655</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Mary, it was poor word choice on my part.  Reagan was in favor of eliminating a lot of deductions to make the Tax Code more *fair* (sound familiar?).  He later gave his famous speech before the NAR where he promised to &quot;preserve the part of the American dream which the home-mortgage-interest deduction symbolizes.&quot;  He, of course, did and the MID is now one of the most popular deductions for itemizers.  What I meant to say is that Reagan&#039;s public endorsement of the MID solidified the deduction as an entitlement and in that regard, it wasn&#039;t going anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Mary, it was poor word choice on my part.  Reagan was in favor of eliminating a lot of deductions to make the Tax Code more *fair* (sound familiar?).  He later gave his famous speech before the NAR where he promised to &#8220;preserve the part of the American dream which the home-mortgage-interest deduction symbolizes.&#8221;  He, of course, did and the MID is now one of the most popular deductions for itemizers.  What I meant to say is that Reagan&#8217;s public endorsement of the MID solidified the deduction as an entitlement and in that regard, it wasn&#8217;t going anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary O'Keeffe</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-sunday-mailbag/comment-page-1/#comment-12652</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary O'Keeffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=4224#comment-12652</guid>
		<description>One more really important tax reform under Reagan:   indexing the tax code for inflation!   We had double-digit inflation in the early 1980s, and people were getting pushed into higher and higher brackets, even when their income was barely keeping up with inflation---until finally the tax code got indexed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more really important tax reform under Reagan:   indexing the tax code for inflation!   We had double-digit inflation in the early 1980s, and people were getting pushed into higher and higher brackets, even when their income was barely keeping up with inflation&#8212;until finally the tax code got indexed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary O'Keeffe</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-sunday-mailbag/comment-page-1/#comment-12651</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary O'Keeffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=4224#comment-12651</guid>
		<description>I agree that the 1986 tax reforms were overall good ones--they simplified the tax code quite a bit, and the broadening of the base allowed tax rates to come down a lot.

However, I&#039;m puzzled by your statement above about the &quot;increase in the home mortgage interest deduction&quot; under Reagan.  I don&#039;t remember any increases in the mortgage interest deduction under Reagan.   In fact, I believe the Reagan tax laws limited the mortgage interest deduction.  

I&#039;m old enough to remember filing tax returns in which ALL interest was deductible, whether mortgage, credit card , auto loan, you name it.  Even the interest people paid on late tax payments was deductible back then!  And there was no limit on the mortgage interest deduction in the old days.   Before the Reagan tax reforms, you could deduct all your mortgage interest, regardless of how many mortgaged houses you owned, regardless of the size of the principal that generated the interest, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the 1986 tax reforms were overall good ones&#8211;they simplified the tax code quite a bit, and the broadening of the base allowed tax rates to come down a lot.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m puzzled by your statement above about the &#8220;increase in the home mortgage interest deduction&#8221; under Reagan.  I don&#8217;t remember any increases in the mortgage interest deduction under Reagan.   In fact, I believe the Reagan tax laws limited the mortgage interest deduction.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m old enough to remember filing tax returns in which ALL interest was deductible, whether mortgage, credit card , auto loan, you name it.  Even the interest people paid on late tax payments was deductible back then!  And there was no limit on the mortgage interest deduction in the old days.   Before the Reagan tax reforms, you could deduct all your mortgage interest, regardless of how many mortgaged houses you owned, regardless of the size of the principal that generated the interest, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-sunday-mailbag/comment-page-1/#comment-12650</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=4224#comment-12650</guid>
		<description>I was in D.C., working for a Congressman who was on Ways &amp; Means,  when the 1986 code changes were made.  I&#039;ve always thought, based on the talk back then, that the official name was &quot;The Historic Tax Act of 1986.&quot; ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in D.C., working for a Congressman who was on Ways &amp; Means,  when the 1986 code changes were made.  I&#8217;ve always thought, based on the talk back then, that the official name was &#8220;The Historic Tax Act of 1986.&#8221; <img src='http://www.taxgirl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-sunday-mailbag/comment-page-1/#comment-12649</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=4224#comment-12649</guid>
		<description>Love the picture! And really love your discussion on having children and a career. It&#039;s a hard question with different answers for different people obviously, but you can certainly make it work if you try hard. My three kiddos are similar ages to yours I think (all under 8) and it was super hard working a full-time legal assistant position with my kids, and I know the lawyers in our office found it hard, as there was often travel involved. Being my own boss has made it easier, at least most of the time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the picture! And really love your discussion on having children and a career. It&#8217;s a hard question with different answers for different people obviously, but you can certainly make it work if you try hard. My three kiddos are similar ages to yours I think (all under <img src='http://www.taxgirl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> and it was super hard working a full-time legal assistant position with my kids, and I know the lawyers in our office found it hard, as there was often travel involved. Being my own boss has made it easier, at least most of the time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-sunday-mailbag/comment-page-1/#comment-12648</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=4224#comment-12648</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I take terrible pictures but my hubby took this one. He tends to keep the heads in his pictures...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I take terrible pictures but my hubby took this one. He tends to keep the heads in his pictures&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-sunday-mailbag/comment-page-1/#comment-12647</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=4224#comment-12647</guid>
		<description>Glad to see your kiddos so we can put faces to the various meltdowns, breaking into song, and &quot;excited utterances.&quot;  Beautiful photo, taxgirl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see your kiddos so we can put faces to the various meltdowns, breaking into song, and &#8220;excited utterances.&#8221;  Beautiful photo, taxgirl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention More Sunday Mailbag &#124; taxgirl -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/more-sunday-mailbag/comment-page-1/#comment-12646</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention More Sunday Mailbag &#124; taxgirl -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=4224#comment-12646</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kelly Phillips Erb, Ellen Victor. Ellen Victor said: I am now officially in awe. RT @taxgirl: More Sunday mailbag: http://bit.ly/1tdJSf [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kelly Phillips Erb, Ellen Victor. Ellen Victor said: I am now officially in awe. RT @taxgirl: More Sunday mailbag: <a href="http://bit.ly/1tdJSf" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1tdJSf</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

