<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oakland Votes to Tax Marijuana</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/oakland-votes-to-tax-marijuana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/oakland-votes-to-tax-marijuana/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn&#039;t be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Say No: Pot Not Allowed as Medical Expense &#124; taxgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/oakland-votes-to-tax-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-26291</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Say No: Pot Not Allowed as Medical Expense &#124; taxgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3664#comment-26291</guid>
		<description>[...] The feds haven&#8217;t been able to sort out how to treat medical marijuana from a tax perspective either. It&#8217;s a question loaded with all kinds of baggage since the criminality of marijuana today can be linked to the decision to tax it in the 1930s. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The feds haven&#8217;t been able to sort out how to treat medical marijuana from a tax perspective either. It&#8217;s a question loaded with all kinds of baggage since the criminality of marijuana today can be linked to the decision to tax it in the 1930s. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oaksterdam is growing &#8211; more medical marijuana clubs</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/oakland-votes-to-tax-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-26275</link>
		<dc:creator>Oaksterdam is growing &#8211; more medical marijuana clubs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3664#comment-26275</guid>
		<description>[...] first Cannabis University or &#8220;weed college&#8221;. In 2009 Oakland was the first US City to tax Medical Marijuana.Why would the City of Oakland do such a thing? Well it&#8217;s because Oakland charges a $60,000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first Cannabis University or &#8220;weed college&#8221;. In 2009 Oakland was the first US City to tax Medical Marijuana.Why would the City of Oakland do such a thing? Well it&#8217;s because Oakland charges a $60,000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IRS Just Says No to Medical Marijuana Deductions &#124; taxgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/oakland-votes-to-tax-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-25891</link>
		<dc:creator>IRS Just Says No to Medical Marijuana Deductions &#124; taxgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 01:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3664#comment-25891</guid>
		<description>[...] So, marijuana is legal for some purposes in some states but largely remains illegal across the country. That makes taxing it tricky. In fact, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the f.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, marijuana is legal for some purposes in some states but largely remains illegal across the country. That makes taxing it tricky. In fact, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the f&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IRS Just Says No to Medical Marijuana Deductions &#171; www.arizonamedicalmarijuanacard.info</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/oakland-votes-to-tax-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-25811</link>
		<dc:creator>IRS Just Says No to Medical Marijuana Deductions &#171; www.arizonamedicalmarijuanacard.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3664#comment-25811</guid>
		<description>[...] So, marijuana is legal for some purposes in some states but largely remains illegal across the country. That makes taxing it tricky. In fact, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the f.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, marijuana is legal for some purposes in some states but largely remains illegal across the country. That makes taxing it tricky. In fact, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the f&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweetening the Pot: Taxing Medical Marijuana Reaps Benefits in San Jose &#124; taxgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/oakland-votes-to-tax-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-25556</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweetening the Pot: Taxing Medical Marijuana Reaps Benefits in San Jose &#124; taxgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3664#comment-25556</guid>
		<description>[...] states is that taking steps to tax marijuana, medical or not, still requires treading carefully. As I’ve noted before, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] states is that taking steps to tax marijuana, medical or not, still requires treading carefully. As I’ve noted before, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweetening the Pot: Taxing Medical Marijuana Reaps Benefits in San Jose &#171; Kind Buds Collective</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/oakland-votes-to-tax-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-25493</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweetening the Pot: Taxing Medical Marijuana Reaps Benefits in San Jose &#171; Kind Buds Collective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 21:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3664#comment-25493</guid>
		<description>[...] states is that taking steps to tax marijuana, medical or not, still requires treading carefully. As I’ve noted before, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] states is that taking steps to tax marijuana, medical or not, still requires treading carefully. As I’ve noted before, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweetening the Pot: Taxing Medical Marijuana Reaps Benefits in San Jose &#124; California Marijuana Dispensaries and Collectives</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/oakland-votes-to-tax-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-25480</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweetening the Pot: Taxing Medical Marijuana Reaps Benefits in San Jose &#124; California Marijuana Dispensaries and Collectives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 13:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3664#comment-25480</guid>
		<description>[...] states is that taking steps to tax marijuana, medical or not, still requires treading carefully. As Ive noted before, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] states is that taking steps to tax marijuana, medical or not, still requires treading carefully. As Ive noted before, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweetening the Pot: Taxing Medical Marijuana Reaps Benefits in San Jose &#124; Wine Resources Reviews and Ratings</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/oakland-votes-to-tax-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-25472</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweetening the Pot: Taxing Medical Marijuana Reaps Benefits in San Jose &#124; Wine Resources Reviews and Ratings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 05:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3664#comment-25472</guid>
		<description>[...] states is that taking steps to tax marijuana, medical or not, still requires treading carefully. As I’ve noted before, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] states is that taking steps to tax marijuana, medical or not, still requires treading carefully. As I’ve noted before, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweetening the Pot: Taxing Medical Marijuana Reaps Benefits in San Jose - Kelly Phillips Erb - Taxgirl - Forbes</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/oakland-votes-to-tax-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-25467</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweetening the Pot: Taxing Medical Marijuana Reaps Benefits in San Jose - Kelly Phillips Erb - Taxgirl - Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 20:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3664#comment-25467</guid>
		<description>[...] states is that taking steps to tax marijuana, medical or not, still requires treading carefully. As I’ve noted before, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] states is that taking steps to tax marijuana, medical or not, still requires treading carefully. As I’ve noted before, it was the taxation of marijuana in the 1930s which lead to the criminalization of the drug in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/oakland-votes-to-tax-marijuana/comment-page-1/#comment-14999</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3664#comment-14999</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Irie, for your explanation.  The DPH web site explains it further:  http://www.dphhs.mt.gov/medicalmarijuana/  The statute uses words like &quot;delivery&quot; and &quot;transfer&quot; but not sale.  I&#039;m thinking the legislature engaged in a little bit of word play in order to get it passed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Irie, for your explanation.  The DPH web site explains it further:  <a href="http://www.dphhs.mt.gov/medicalmarijuana/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dphhs.mt.gov/medicalmarijuana/</a>  The statute uses words like &#8220;delivery&#8221; and &#8220;transfer&#8221; but not sale.  I&#8217;m thinking the legislature engaged in a little bit of word play in order to get it passed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

