<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plop, Plop, Fizz, Fizz &#8211; Lame AMT Relief It Is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn't be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:18:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: McCain Backs Off Repeal of AMT</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-8027</link>
		<dc:creator>McCain Backs Off Repeal of AMT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 03:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/#comment-8027</guid>
		<description>[...] Senator McCain is certainly not alone in this conundrum. When faced with the opportunity to repeal the tax in 2007, Congress did not, instead putting a last minute &#8220;band aid package&#8221; together. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Senator McCain is certainly not alone in this conundrum. When faced with the opportunity to repeal the tax in 2007, Congress did not, instead putting a last minute &#8220;band aid package&#8221; together. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Filings Delayed This Year</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-3772</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Filings Delayed This Year</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/#comment-3772</guid>
		<description>[...] some of its computers in early December because the changes could be done on a backup basis. When the law was changed, the backups were put into immediate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some of its computers in early December because the changes could be done on a backup basis. When the law was changed, the backups were put into immediate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Taxgirl Headlines of 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-3773</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Taxgirl Headlines of 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/#comment-3773</guid>
		<description>[...] 3, Congress promises to fix the AMT problem. And promises. And promises. And then they sort of do - on the very last day of their work year (psst, it&#8217;s only temporary). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3, Congress promises to fix the AMT problem. And promises. And promises. And then they sort of do &#8211; on the very last day of their work year (psst, it&#8217;s only temporary). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-3771</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/#comment-3771</guid>
		<description>I agree with both of you.

I am all about a very simple tax code. No deductions--everyone pays. I call it a &quot;graduated flat tax&quot; (yay! bureaucratic double-speak).

The percentage of your income that you pay goes up with your income (and hence, your ability to pay). Of course, the highest percentage in my dream scheme is 18% of income for Fed taxes for individuals/families, and 27% of income for major corps...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with both of you.</p>
<p>I am all about a very simple tax code. No deductions&#8211;everyone pays. I call it a &#8220;graduated flat tax&#8221; (yay! bureaucratic double-speak).</p>
<p>The percentage of your income that you pay goes up with your income (and hence, your ability to pay). Of course, the highest percentage in my dream scheme is 18% of income for Fed taxes for individuals/families, and 27% of income for major corps&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-3770</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/#comment-3770</guid>
		<description>Anne, I&#039;m right there with you.  The plan is fiscally not sound - but we needed the AMT relief.  Not sure what&#039;s going to come of any of it.  A patch is completely the wrong way to go - but better than nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne, I&#8217;m right there with you.  The plan is fiscally not sound &#8211; but we needed the AMT relief.  Not sure what&#8217;s going to come of any of it.  A patch is completely the wrong way to go &#8211; but better than nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Wayman</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-3769</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Wayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/plop-plop-fizz-fizz-lame-amt-relief-it-is/#comment-3769</guid>
		<description>sigh, just another example where the dems caved... I&#039;m not surprised, but I sure am pissed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sigh, just another example where the dems caved&#8230; I&#8217;m not surprised, but I sure am pissed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
