<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prop 8 Passes in California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/prop-8-passes-in-california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/prop-8-passes-in-california/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn&#039;t be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:02:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Like the Way I Do: Melissa Etheridge Threatens Not to Pay State Taxes &#124; taxgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/prop-8-passes-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-7309</link>
		<dc:creator>Like the Way I Do: Melissa Etheridge Threatens Not to Pay State Taxes &#124; taxgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1766#comment-7309</guid>
		<description>[...] an article posted on The Daily Beast, Etheridge railed against the passing of Proposition 8 in California. Proposition 8 is, as you may know, a law which defines marriage in California as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an article posted on The Daily Beast, Etheridge railed against the passing of Proposition 8 in California. Proposition 8 is, as you may know, a law which defines marriage in California as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/prop-8-passes-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-7249</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1766#comment-7249</guid>
		<description>Joe, I listened to the &quot;news story&quot; you posted a link to.  That isn&#039;t the British press painting a picture where same sex marriage would lead us.  It is a satire site and the story is making fun of people who oppose same sex marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, I listened to the &#8220;news story&#8221; you posted a link to.  That isn&#8217;t the British press painting a picture where same sex marriage would lead us.  It is a satire site and the story is making fun of people who oppose same sex marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/prop-8-passes-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-7242</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1766#comment-7242</guid>
		<description>Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting for whats for dinner.

Steve, why are you opposed to same sex marriage?

Sadly, a loss of freedom for one person puts all of our freedoms in jeopardy.  I don&#039;t want the government telling me who I can marry.  My freedom to marry who I wish will always be at risk as long as the gay community does not have that freedom.  What next, will only people who can procreate be able to marry?  Maybe we should only allow people to marry who we think will make good parents or maybe we should match people so there is &quot;ideal&quot; genetic matching.  Maybe we should demand that people be with in a certain age of each other before they can marry? Or perhaps we shouldn&#039;t let people marry who have been convicted of a crime.  Or, should we keep people who have already gotten divorced from marrying?  There are many, many ways the government can interfere with our freedom of association, yours could be threatened also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting for whats for dinner.</p>
<p>Steve, why are you opposed to same sex marriage?</p>
<p>Sadly, a loss of freedom for one person puts all of our freedoms in jeopardy.  I don&#8217;t want the government telling me who I can marry.  My freedom to marry who I wish will always be at risk as long as the gay community does not have that freedom.  What next, will only people who can procreate be able to marry?  Maybe we should only allow people to marry who we think will make good parents or maybe we should match people so there is &#8220;ideal&#8221; genetic matching.  Maybe we should demand that people be with in a certain age of each other before they can marry? Or perhaps we shouldn&#8217;t let people marry who have been convicted of a crime.  Or, should we keep people who have already gotten divorced from marrying?  There are many, many ways the government can interfere with our freedom of association, yours could be threatened also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/prop-8-passes-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-7238</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1766#comment-7238</guid>
		<description>The biggest debate re: Prop 8 seems to be about what tangibly would happen if it did or did not pass.  The British press painted a pretty fascinating picture of the direction in which allowing gay marriage would lead us.

http://irrationalpublicradio.com/pe6.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest debate re: Prop 8 seems to be about what tangibly would happen if it did or did not pass.  The British press painted a pretty fascinating picture of the direction in which allowing gay marriage would lead us.</p>
<p><a href="http://irrationalpublicradio.com/pe6.html" rel="nofollow">http://irrationalpublicradio.com/pe6.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/prop-8-passes-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-7209</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1766#comment-7209</guid>
		<description>Personally, I&#039;m still waiting for my tortoise.

I&quot;m pretty sure history will actually show that it&#039;s the far right that&#039;s hi-jacked the Republican party and that&#039;s why y&#039;all lost in a resounding landslide.  

One of the points the framers of the  US constitution felt was important to make is that the minority need to be protected from the majority, and you can&#039;t simply vote away the rights of groups of  people&#039;s you don&#039;t like, even if that&#039;s what the &quot;fair and square&quot; majority want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I&#8217;m still waiting for my tortoise.</p>
<p>I&#8221;m pretty sure history will actually show that it&#8217;s the far right that&#8217;s hi-jacked the Republican party and that&#8217;s why y&#8217;all lost in a resounding landslide.  </p>
<p>One of the points the framers of the  US constitution felt was important to make is that the minority need to be protected from the majority, and you can&#8217;t simply vote away the rights of groups of  people&#8217;s you don&#8217;t like, even if that&#8217;s what the &#8220;fair and square&#8221; majority want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/prop-8-passes-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-7207</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1766#comment-7207</guid>
		<description>I knew going into this that the GLBT agenda wouldn&#039;t quit even if they were beat fair-and-square.  Once Obama takes office I&#039;m sure that he as well as congress will make repealing DOMA one of their first priorities. Funny thing is it was Clinton that signed that act into law while he was in office. The Democratic party has been hijacked by the far-left liberal loons, and its heading for the cliff as quickly as it can.  Anarchy and loss of free speach will be next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew going into this that the GLBT agenda wouldn&#8217;t quit even if they were beat fair-and-square.  Once Obama takes office I&#8217;m sure that he as well as congress will make repealing DOMA one of their first priorities. Funny thing is it was Clinton that signed that act into law while he was in office. The Democratic party has been hijacked by the far-left liberal loons, and its heading for the cliff as quickly as it can.  Anarchy and loss of free speach will be next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

