<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Hatch Goes Back to Jail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/richard-hatch-goes-back-to-jail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/richard-hatch-goes-back-to-jail/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn&#039;t be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Hatch Trick? &#124; taxgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/richard-hatch-goes-back-to-jail/comment-page-1/#comment-21595</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Hatch Trick? &#124; taxgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3858#comment-21595</guid>
		<description>[...] checking in with his probation officer or not getting permission to do an interview or something (as he is wont to do). But no. It appears he just likes going to jail &#8211; at least, that&#8217;s how it looks to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] checking in with his probation officer or not getting permission to do an interview or something (as he is wont to do). But no. It appears he just likes going to jail &#8211; at least, that&#8217;s how it looks to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.Setter</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/richard-hatch-goes-back-to-jail/comment-page-1/#comment-12521</link>
		<dc:creator>W.Setter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3858#comment-12521</guid>
		<description>Sadness wells. … All her fans love when even the tax girl, mocks &lt;b&gt;professional misconduct&lt;/b&gt;.

(Sorry babe, the crush is over. I have to end it. It was only an internet thing.) But I still like your website. :)

Nicely done.

~Setter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadness wells. … All her fans love when even the tax girl, mocks <b>professional misconduct</b>.</p>
<p>(Sorry babe, the crush is over. I have to end it. It was only an internet thing.) But I still like your website. <img src='http://www.taxgirl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Nicely done.</p>
<p>~Setter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.Setter</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/richard-hatch-goes-back-to-jail/comment-page-1/#comment-12515</link>
		<dc:creator>W.Setter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3858#comment-12515</guid>
		<description>Taxgirl, great site thank you.  (I have a crush now.)

Hope you take me seriously tho, when I ask:  How would you define legitimate instances of misconduct, where a person believes they are being deceived or lied to, or required to interact with a well-funded taxation agency which is using a dishonest starting point and continues to push the Fraud on Court (in the technical sense)?  

I am asking for authentic instances that you know about, and how you would define misconduct, from a tax-agency or officer, in theory (without known instances).

My concern is stemming from the increasing sense that states are desperate for revenue and are willing to push fraud on people, who did not have an income:  Creating a fiction of income, so the state can create wealth from that fiction.  Or attempt to draw wealth from that fiction - give pretense that the state is more wealthy than it is, because of balances owed (because of potential accounting gimmicks and overshadowing a silent campaign to ding people who have no income).   

This is mainly an attack on the elderly and in large enough numbers, dinging them for income, when they have no income, can be an egregious practice.  But it is not limited to the elderly.  Any person who does not have an income is vulnerable, because the state can be pushy when sending out final notices, especially on people without an income knowing this class to have less resources available to them, or ability to defend themselves, ability to write, are looked down upon for not filing ectera (perceived by the state as an easy mark). ---- 

Example:  I&#039;m a state tax collector leveraging claims for large amounts, to see what the state can pull out of their teeth fillings. --- Wait its not misconduct, that only happens to Richard Hatch the fat nude guy on our, ah, tehelaa vizzion .... If it is not prosecutor misconduct, then what do you call it venerable tax girl?  

A &#039;rush to justice?&#039;

How do you define misconduct and do you suppose that because Mr. Hatch has made a statement about professional misconduct, that professional misconduct is a vapor in the hallways of thousands of tax departments around the humble country?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taxgirl, great site thank you.  (I have a crush now.)</p>
<p>Hope you take me seriously tho, when I ask:  How would you define legitimate instances of misconduct, where a person believes they are being deceived or lied to, or required to interact with a well-funded taxation agency which is using a dishonest starting point and continues to push the Fraud on Court (in the technical sense)?  </p>
<p>I am asking for authentic instances that you know about, and how you would define misconduct, from a tax-agency or officer, in theory (without known instances).</p>
<p>My concern is stemming from the increasing sense that states are desperate for revenue and are willing to push fraud on people, who did not have an income:  Creating a fiction of income, so the state can create wealth from that fiction.  Or attempt to draw wealth from that fiction &#8211; give pretense that the state is more wealthy than it is, because of balances owed (because of potential accounting gimmicks and overshadowing a silent campaign to ding people who have no income).   </p>
<p>This is mainly an attack on the elderly and in large enough numbers, dinging them for income, when they have no income, can be an egregious practice.  But it is not limited to the elderly.  Any person who does not have an income is vulnerable, because the state can be pushy when sending out final notices, especially on people without an income knowing this class to have less resources available to them, or ability to defend themselves, ability to write, are looked down upon for not filing ectera (perceived by the state as an easy mark). &#8212;- </p>
<p>Example:  I&#8217;m a state tax collector leveraging claims for large amounts, to see what the state can pull out of their teeth fillings. &#8212; Wait its not misconduct, that only happens to Richard Hatch the fat nude guy on our, ah, tehelaa vizzion &#8230;. If it is not prosecutor misconduct, then what do you call it venerable tax girl?  </p>
<p>A &#8216;rush to justice?&#8217;</p>
<p>How do you define misconduct and do you suppose that because Mr. Hatch has made a statement about professional misconduct, that professional misconduct is a vapor in the hallways of thousands of tax departments around the humble country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Butak</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/richard-hatch-goes-back-to-jail/comment-page-1/#comment-12321</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Butak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3858#comment-12321</guid>
		<description>Please, PlEASE!!! put me on the jury for Mr Hatch&#039;s trial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, PlEASE!!! put me on the jury for Mr Hatch&#8217;s trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hatch Wants to Go Home &#124; taxgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/richard-hatch-goes-back-to-jail/comment-page-1/#comment-12298</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hatch Wants to Go Home &#124; taxgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3858#comment-12298</guid>
		<description>[...] September 30, 2009 &#183; 0 comments   Richard Hatch is not having a good year. After qualifying for early release from federal prison, where he was serving time on tax evasion charges, he was allowed to spend the remainder of his sentence at his sister&#8217;s house as house arrest. Hatch, not necessarily being the most conventional guy, apparently had a different interpretation of his media appearance rules than the Bureau of Prisons did: his recent stints on TV and radio landed him in hot water when he failed to get the proper permissio.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] September 30, 2009 &middot; 0 comments   Richard Hatch is not having a good year. After qualifying for early release from federal prison, where he was serving time on tax evasion charges, he was allowed to spend the remainder of his sentence at his sister&#8217;s house as house arrest. Hatch, not necessarily being the most conventional guy, apparently had a different interpretation of his media appearance rules than the Bureau of Prisons did: his recent stints on TV and radio landed him in hot water when he failed to get the proper permissio&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Day</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/richard-hatch-goes-back-to-jail/comment-page-1/#comment-11507</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3858#comment-11507</guid>
		<description>This blogm this time hit the nail on the head to me, although I don&#039;t know if you realize it.  No matter what we refer to, the preponderance of the people of the USA take the attitude:  &quot;Mommy it isn&#039;t fair&quot;.

With the socialists in charge of our government, it doesn&#039;t look like it is going to get better anytime soon.

Jeff Day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blogm this time hit the nail on the head to me, although I don&#8217;t know if you realize it.  No matter what we refer to, the preponderance of the people of the USA take the attitude:  &#8220;Mommy it isn&#8217;t fair&#8221;.</p>
<p>With the socialists in charge of our government, it doesn&#8217;t look like it is going to get better anytime soon.</p>
<p>Jeff Day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/richard-hatch-goes-back-to-jail/comment-page-1/#comment-11489</link>
		<dc:creator>My Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=3858#comment-11489</guid>
		<description>He so crazy that no group will stand up for him!  Where is Rev. Jesse when you need him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He so crazy that no group will stand up for him!  Where is Rev. Jesse when you need him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

