<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So I&#8217;m Not Jessica Alba&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/so-im-not-jessica-alba/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/so-im-not-jessica-alba/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn&#039;t be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:02:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deirdre</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/so-im-not-jessica-alba/comment-page-1/#comment-9745</link>
		<dc:creator>Deirdre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=2989#comment-9745</guid>
		<description>Wow! This is fabulous and cool! I will tivo your TV appearance as well!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! This is fabulous and cool! I will tivo your TV appearance as well!! <img src='http://www.taxgirl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin Kao</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/so-im-not-jessica-alba/comment-page-1/#comment-9740</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin Kao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=2989#comment-9740</guid>
		<description>Yay for you for getting interviewed, and yay for me for actually reading an Esquire article.  I am actually surprised that they didn&#039;t used to require the social security numbers of the dependents.  What if two people claim the same dependent, like what a reader asked earlier this week?  But at least that&#039;s fixed now.  Makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay for you for getting interviewed, and yay for me for actually reading an Esquire article.  I am actually surprised that they didn&#8217;t used to require the social security numbers of the dependents.  What if two people claim the same dependent, like what a reader asked earlier this week?  But at least that&#8217;s fixed now.  Makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

