<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State Tax Primer from A to W:  Alaska</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/state-tax-primer-from-a-to-w-alaska/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/state-tax-primer-from-a-to-w-alaska/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn&#039;t be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:02:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 most tax-friendly states to live in &#8211; 1776 Coalition</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/state-tax-primer-from-a-to-w-alaska/comment-page-1/#comment-15852</link>
		<dc:creator>5 most tax-friendly states to live in &#8211; 1776 Coalition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1802#comment-15852</guid>
		<description>[...] Alaska. Alaska doesn&#8217;t have a state income tax, state sales tax or a state inheritance tax. As tax burdens go, it&#8217;s the best state to live [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alaska. Alaska doesn&#8217;t have a state income tax, state sales tax or a state inheritance tax. As tax burdens go, it&#8217;s the best state to live [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 most tax-friendly states to live in - Alaska (AK) - City-Data Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/state-tax-primer-from-a-to-w-alaska/comment-page-1/#comment-15836</link>
		<dc:creator>5 most tax-friendly states to live in - Alaska (AK) - City-Data Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1802#comment-15836</guid>
		<description>[...] most tax-friendly states to live in   1. Alaska. Alaska doesn&#039;t have a state income tax, state sales tax or a state inheritance tax. As tax burdens go, it&#039;s the best state to live in.   It hasn&#039;t always been that way. In 1978, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most tax-friendly states to live in   1. Alaska. Alaska doesn&#39;t have a state income tax, state sales tax or a state inheritance tax. As tax burdens go, it&#39;s the best state to live in.   It hasn&#39;t always been that way. In 1978, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/state-tax-primer-from-a-to-w-alaska/comment-page-1/#comment-15169</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1802#comment-15169</guid>
		<description>The Truth, the facts are correct. This story was written in November 2008, just a couple of weeks after Stevens was convicted of seven felony counts:  http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/28/washington/28stevens.html

He wasn&#039;t &quot;proven innocent&quot; later.  There were charges of prosecutorial misconduct so the conviction was vacated in April 2009.  Those are very different things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Truth, the facts are correct. This story was written in November 2008, just a couple of weeks after Stevens was convicted of seven felony counts:  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/28/washington/28stevens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/28/washington/28stevens.html</a></p>
<p>He wasn&#8217;t &#8220;proven innocent&#8221; later.  There were charges of prosecutorial misconduct so the conviction was vacated in April 2009.  Those are very different things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheTruth</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/state-tax-primer-from-a-to-w-alaska/comment-page-1/#comment-15167</link>
		<dc:creator>TheTruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1802#comment-15167</guid>
		<description>akryan, thank you for shedding some light on these ignorant liberals. They&#039;re too busy wallowing around in their ignorance to get a clue. 

Oh and Stevens was proven innocent, the writer should get her facts straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>akryan, thank you for shedding some light on these ignorant liberals. They&#8217;re too busy wallowing around in their ignorance to get a clue. </p>
<p>Oh and Stevens was proven innocent, the writer should get her facts straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akryan</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/state-tax-primer-from-a-to-w-alaska/comment-page-1/#comment-8792</link>
		<dc:creator>akryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1802#comment-8792</guid>
		<description>Okay, it is very true that we are federal welfare whores but let us develop ANWR. Imagine if the people in Iowa were suddenly told that they couldn&#039;t farm on the most arable land in the state because the federal gov&#039;t decided it should be a wildlife preserve. It&#039;s the same thing for us. People hear the words Wildlife Reserve and they picture caribou prancing through the woods. ANWR is like a moonscape over most of it. The initial pipeline didn&#039;t destroy the natural beauty of the state and neither will this. The drill area itself would be about as big as an airport in the middle of an area bigger than some states. And BTW, until you stop driving and using any petroleum product please spare me the global warming lectures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, it is very true that we are federal welfare whores but let us develop ANWR. Imagine if the people in Iowa were suddenly told that they couldn&#8217;t farm on the most arable land in the state because the federal gov&#8217;t decided it should be a wildlife preserve. It&#8217;s the same thing for us. People hear the words Wildlife Reserve and they picture caribou prancing through the woods. ANWR is like a moonscape over most of it. The initial pipeline didn&#8217;t destroy the natural beauty of the state and neither will this. The drill area itself would be about as big as an airport in the middle of an area bigger than some states. And BTW, until you stop driving and using any petroleum product please spare me the global warming lectures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: State Tax Primer from A to W: Arizona</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/state-tax-primer-from-a-to-w-alaska/comment-page-1/#comment-7994</link>
		<dc:creator>State Tax Primer from A to W: Arizona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1802#comment-7994</guid>
		<description>[...] this year the least of any state (though in prior years, they ranked much higher). In comparison, Alaska received the most per capita, a total of $506.34 per capita. (source and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this year the least of any state (though in prior years, they ranked much higher). In comparison, Alaska received the most per capita, a total of $506.34 per capita. (source and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WHAT’S THE BUZZ? TELL ME WHAT’S A HAPPENNIN’ &#124; The-Informer</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/state-tax-primer-from-a-to-w-alaska/comment-page-1/#comment-7507</link>
		<dc:creator>WHAT’S THE BUZZ? TELL ME WHAT’S A HAPPENNIN’ &#124; The-Informer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1802#comment-7507</guid>
		<description>[...] * TAX GIRL Kelly Phillips Erb continues her State Tax Primer from A to W with Alaska. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] * TAX GIRL Kelly Phillips Erb continues her State Tax Primer from A to W with Alaska. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robyn</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/state-tax-primer-from-a-to-w-alaska/comment-page-1/#comment-7364</link>
		<dc:creator>Robyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1802#comment-7364</guid>
		<description>So this is where all the &quot;welfare mothers&quot; went!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this is where all the &#8220;welfare mothers&#8221; went!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Safe Real Estate Info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; State Tax Primer from A to W: Alaska &#124; taxgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/state-tax-primer-from-a-to-w-alaska/comment-page-1/#comment-7356</link>
		<dc:creator>Safe Real Estate Info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; State Tax Primer from A to W: Alaska &#124; taxgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1802#comment-7356</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onState Tax Primer from A to W: Alaska &#124; taxgirlHere&#8217;s a quick excerptSales Tax. Alaska has no state sales tax - one of five such states in the nation. However, municipalities can - and many do - collect a local sales tax. Local sales tax, when imposed, hovers at around 5%. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onState Tax Primer from A to W: Alaska | taxgirlHere&#8217;s a quick excerptSales Tax. Alaska has no state sales tax &#8211; one of five such states in the nation. However, municipalities can &#8211; and many do &#8211; collect a local sales tax. Local sales tax, when imposed, hovers at around 5%. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suz</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/state-tax-primer-from-a-to-w-alaska/comment-page-1/#comment-7354</link>
		<dc:creator>Suz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/?p=1802#comment-7354</guid>
		<description>&#039;We&#039; may be destroying their state, but not as fast as they want.  I believe it&#039;s Alaskans who want to drill in ANWR so badly.  So...THEY are choosing money from oil companies over maintaining their beautiful state and we are paying them extra for the priviledge of giving them what they want.  Doesn&#039;t seem fair to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;We&#8217; may be destroying their state, but not as fast as they want.  I believe it&#8217;s Alaskans who want to drill in ANWR so badly.  So&#8230;THEY are choosing money from oil companies over maintaining their beautiful state and we are paying them extra for the priviledge of giving them what they want.  Doesn&#8217;t seem fair to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

