Posts tagged as:

Apple

It’s Fix the Tax Code Friday! Yesterday, I blogged about NC’s efforts to woo Apple and Google to the Tarheel state by passing corporate tax breaks directed at each of them. This is nothing new. In my own state of Pennsylvania, a new film tax credit is being touted in an effort to bring more filmmakers to the area. Similar programs have also been created in parts of Canada, like Vancouver, to attract moviemakers up the coast and away from California.

And sometimes the credits are not so much about attracting a company as keeping it from going (see almost every professional sports team stadium in the US).

The idea behind these tax credits is that bringing industry will create jobs. Those jobs will result in the need for more local services. And voila, it’s a ripple effect. But that doesn’t always happen. And when it does happen, it’s not always at the level that the lawmakers had hoped.

But sometimes it does work.

So today’s “Fix the Tax Code Friday” question is:

Are tax breaks targeted towards keeping or attracting certain companies worth it? And if so, does it matter that the individual taxpayers may have to pick up the slack through increased tax rates or decreased services in the short term if the plan is for increased revenue to the state (or locality) in the long term?

{ 5 comments }

apples.jpgIn a tough economy – when a state can’t yet pay its bills – you’d think the fiscal plan for the future would be conservative. Not so, North Carolina. Despite massive budget woes, the state legislature has agreed to special tax breaks designed to bring Apple to the Tarheel State.

Apple, the company that makes Mac computers (including the very MacBook I’m typing this blog entry on), the ubiquitous iPods and the iPhones that I would buy if they hadn’t struck a silly deal with AT&T, has confirmed that it will build a data warehouse “somewhere” in North Carolina. The deal requires Apple to build the warehouse outside of the twenty most wealthy counties in the state. This means no to counties like Wake and Mecklenberg; most of the Research Triangle Park and the Piedmont will be excluded.

The deal wasn’t unexpected, as North Carolina worked hard to position itself to get the business – even passing a massive tax break specifically targeted to Apple.

So what does this get the state? Free computers for its cash-strapped schools? New iPods to support the struggling arts programs? Nope, it gets – wait for it – the guarantee of 50 jobs over 9 years.

Whew. Just let that sink it. Fifty whole jobs.

Of course, Governor Perdue of North Carolina (no chicken jokes, please) believes that an additional 250 jobs could be attributed to the data center. Those jobs would be related to providing services for the whopping 50 new employees.

In defense of their position, Commerce Secretary Crisco was ready with his obligatory crystal-ball reading. “Technology-driven projects like this may bring fewer overall jobs than traditional industry, but they have a tremendous economic impact through locally purchased goods and services.”

In other words, they’re hoping that it brings in more cash.

How much is it costing the state? Initially, about $46 million in foregone tax revenue over the next ten years. If Apple sticks it out in NC for at least 30 years, the company could save more than $300 million on corporate taxes. That’s more than the tax package the state offered Google just a couple of years ago to open its data center in western NC: Google will only save $260 million over 30 years.

But hey, look what Google has brought to NC… *sounds of crickets chirping*

(At least Apple will make NC look cool.)

As you can imagine, not everyone is excited about the new tax breaks. A law suit has already been filed against the state with respect to Google – expect more of the same in response to the Apple package. While those companies get tax breaks, NC taxpayers are being asked to cough up a little more out of their own pockets in order to meet the $4.6 billion budget gap looming on the horizon.

I generally think encouraging investment is a good thing. And as a former North Carolina girl, I understand that the state could use additional revenue. Unemployment rates are increasing as companies move their manufacturing jobs out of the state (my dad was a victim of DuPont’s flight south to Mexico) and agriculture increasingly becomes outsourced (yes, it’s true that we actually import a significant amount of food in the US). Giving companies incentives to move to North Carolina may be good for the state. May.

But, in this case, the timing and scale seem a little off. This is the same state that threatened to delay tax refunds as well as raise taxes and fees to meet the budget in 2008 – in a year that saw the poverty rate in the state increase. People in the state are hurting. And yes, I get that people need industry and investment to survive. But the statistics since 2000 have not demonstrated a correlation between increased spending for investment and increased prosperity for the people of the state.

The investment in Google in the western part of the state hasn’t provided a significant bump in the economy. Although the company indicated that it might hire as many as 200 employees, a year after the deal was finalized, Business Week reported that Google had hired 1 full time employee. Just one.

How ’bout them apples?

Update: More from the Tax Update Blog with a must see illustration!

{ 5 comments }

iPod.jpg

Despite the Obama administration’s efforts to close the gap between decreasing revenues and increasing expenditures, the federal deficit is expected to soar this year. Congress has been scrambling for ways to find extra dollars and one Congressman believes he’s found a way: tax online music.

It’s no wonder. The number of songs sold online is exploding; early in the year, Apple announced that it had sold more than 6 billion songs on iTunes. Most iTunes are sold for 99 cents each.

The federal proposal would impose a penny tax on all downloaded music in or originating from the US. Ostensibly, this would include all iTunes music since the company is based out of Cupertino, California.

After advising his colleagues to “do the math” (and summoning a page with a calculator), the Congressman noted that, on iTunes music alone, the penny tax would have raised $60 million, roughly the cost of 3 hours worth of funding to AIG (assuming $170 billion bailout over the course of one year).

There was immediate reaction from the music industry, claiming that a tax on music had the potential to suppress sales, including songs with actual merit. As a result of those concerns, an exemption from the tax has been proposed for performers which could prove that either their lyrics or original musical compositions provided “substantial and irreplaceable contributions to the music or art world.”

Performers Britney Spears and Mariah Carey immediately issued statements that they would not seek an exemption. Spears, speaking from her car, said, “I’m just country, y’all. I never meant to do art.” Congress agreed.

Bono, responding to the news, was certain that this was another way that the revenues from his music would avoid taxation. “Wow,” he reacted. “We didn’t even have to move to the Netherlands for this one.” The popular lead singer of the band U2 has faced criticism in recent years for his decision to move the band from Ireland to the Netherlands to avoid paying taxes (he claims that he did it just for the cheese).

Pop icons didn’t rule the day, however. Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) proposed an amendment to the bill which would exempt bluegrass and other folk music from the tax. Holding up his own album, US Senator Robert Byrd: Mountain Fiddler (County, 1978), as an example (I’m not making that up – Google it), Byrd noted that there are some classes of “the people’s music” which are in danger of disappearing. Adding a penny tax to tunes downloaded onto an already expensive iPod could make the music unaffordable, he argued. Senators, who remember (perhaps fondly) Byrd occasionally picking up a fiddle in the chambers were sympathetic to his case, but otherwise unmoved.

Noted Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), exempting bluegrass music could lead the Senate down the slippery slope of having to carve out other exceptions. He said, “If we exempt one class of music, we’d have to exempt others,” pointing out that the Pennsylvania Polka would not have been saved under Sen. Byrd’s exemption. Specter was immediately criticized by conservatives by invoking a song with the lyrics “Gay with laughter happy as can be, They stop to have a beer.”

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) argued that the bill didn’t go far enough. Taking the floor, he denounced online music as just adding to the entire immoral culture of rock and roll, saying:

“Even if this was not a law… I’m afraid I would have a lot of difficulty endorsing an enterprise which is as fraught with genuine peril as I believe this one to be. Besides the liquor and the drugs which always seem to accompany such an event the thing that distresses me even more… is the spiritual corruption that can be involved. These dances and this kind of music can be destructive, and, uh,… I’m afraid you’re going to find most of the people in our community are gonna agree with me on this.”

Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN) stopped DeMint before he could go much further, calling him out for quoting the big Reverend Shaw Moore scene from the movie “Footloose.”

Of course, it was not unexpected that Apple voiced one of the loudest objections to the bill, claiming the company was being unfairly targeted simply for being cool. The company also noted that the penny tax would boost the cost of most iTunes to an even dollar, creating a serious shortage in the virtual “take a penny, leave a penny” jar.

Despite the controversy surrounding the bill, a vote is expected to take place later today, on April 1st, otherwise known as April Fool’s Day. Happy April Fool’s Day!

(Photo courtesy of Sig)

{ 7 comments }

Just before BlogHer, Chris went out and bought me a new laptop. This was a fairly important purchase since my last laptop had more or less lost its portability – kind of an important part of a laptop.

My new laptop is a MacBook, just a more modern version of my prior laptop (only this one is mine, all mine – insert maniacal laughter here – from the beginning whereas the last one was a hand me down). I’ve been playing with the features now and again and today, as my battery wound down, I decided to check out the Speech functions. One of the functions allows you to choose different voices to announce the time, speak text and otherwise operate your computer using voice functions. I was checking out the different voices when I heard the Good News voice say:

“Congratulations! You won the sweepstakes and you don’t have to pay income tax again.”

What? Who writes these things, Apple? You certainly do have to pay income tax on sweepstakes winnings. And likewise, the interest or other income earned as a result of your winnings is also taxable.

And yes, I know, I overthink these things. I can’t help it.

(Psst, Apple, if you’re looking for someone to write some tax voices, I’m totally happy to help!)

{ 0 comments }

Use Tax on iTunes? It Doesn’t Make Sense.

14 July 2008

Another Tax Geek asked me whether I pay Use Tax on my iTunes purchases (you can answer him, too, by voting in our poll in the sidebar). I do not. I started to reply in the comments and felt that my comment was a bit wordy (as I tend to be) and I [...]

32 comments Read the full article →

Don’t Hate Her Because She’s Beautiful.

18 July 2007

Hate her because she’s beautiful and rich.

Supermodel Gisele Bundchen of Brazil topped Forbes.com’s 2007 list of The Top Earning Models in the World with a whopping $33 million earnings last year. Even more surprising, Kate Moss came in second at a “paltry” $9 million – a pretty impressive differential.
Estimates as to Gisele’s US tax [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

iPhone, uTax?

29 June 2007

Working at Apple just got a little sweeter, it seems.
Apple has announced that it is giving free iPhones to all 18,000 of its employees, at a cost of over $10 million to the company. Each of the models is worth about $600.
Cool, right?
The new phones are set to be distributed to employees at the [...]

0 comments Read the full article →