Posts tagged as:

global-warming

Toiletpaperwhitebg.jpg

Taxpayer asks:

Tell me this isn’t true. I got an email today that says that Congress is considering an extra tax on toilet paper. The email says that the Democrats have passed law to tax toilet paper to prevent global warming. I don’t believe in global warming and I think this is a stupid plan to tax us more. So tell me I’m wrong, taxgirl.

Taxgirl says:

While I haven’t received one of these emails, I can tell that something is making the rounds because I’ve received a number of similar questions. Some folks have even claimed that there’s a “per flush” tax. So, I figured that something had to have triggered all of this outrage…

And I found it.

But since you wanted me to tell you that you’re wrong, I will on a significant part of your question: the so-called “toilet paper tax” is not law.

What’s getting all of the fuss is the Water Protection and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as H.R. 3202. The bill was introduced by Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) just last week and despite the rumors making rounds, it is not a solidly Democratic bill. As of yesterday, there were twelve co-sponsors, four of which are Republicans.

The bill is in very early stages: it has not even gone through committee. As of July 17, it was referred to several committees, including the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment.

And now for the text of the bill. There’s a lot in the bill (it’s not a small bill) but I’m just going to focus on tax. The bill would impose a tax on the sale of containers of water-based beverages (4%); water disposal products (3%) and pharmaceuticals (.5%). The tax would be imposed on the manufacturer, producer, or importer and not the retailer or consumer. The tax is intended to be temporary and would end on December 31, 2015.

Of course, the devil’s in the details and that’s what is attracting the most attention…

Water-based beverages are defined as containers of water (duh) and those flavored waters or any beverage “created by mixing water with other liquids, flavorings, vitamins, or other ingredients where the resulting product is at least 50 percent water by weight.” There are a number of exceptions including medications, alcoholic beverages and concentrated beverages.

The most controversial bit is the definition of “water disposal products” which includes “soaps and detergents, toiletries, toilet tissue, water softeners, and cooking oils.” And there’s your toilet paper tax.

Revenues garnered from the tax would be used for a number of water-related programs including pollution clean up programs and safe drinking water funds. Those programs include replacing sewer systems and storm water systems and cleaning up “source water” sites which have been contaminated. The tax, together with an additional corporate tax provision, is expected to raise $10 billion and create 250,000 jobs (according to Blumenauer’s web site).

So yes, there’s a proposal to tax toilet paper. No, it’s not yet law. If you have concerns about the bill – or if you support the bill – let your Representative know (use this handy-dandy link to send a note to your Representative over the web). Now is the time to speak up. My personal take is that if you don’t complain to your Representative now, you don’t have the right to complain later.

Like any good lawyer, I need to add a disclaimer: Unfortunately, it is impossible to give comprehensive tax advice over the internet, no matter how well researched or written. Before relying on any information given on this site, contact a tax professional to discuss your particular situation.

Have a question? Ask the taxgirl!Now on Facebook!

Image courtesy of Wikimedia Creative Commons: Photo taken and released under GFDL by Tristanb.

{ 6 comments }

A Global Warming Tax?

October 22, 2007 · 1 comment

The Dutch Government has a plan to flights leaving the Netherlands an amount equal to $16 for intra-European flights and $64 for intercontinental flights. The proposed tax is being touted as an “environmental tax” to offset carbon emissions from aviation.

However, the Association of European Airlines claims the tax revenues will not be used to fight environmental woes and will discourage air travel. The US seems to agree. “Study after study shows that taxes levied on environmental grounds are not a cost-effective means for reaching the desired environmental outcomes, but merely serve as revenue-raisers for governments,” said Nancy Young, U.S. Air Transport Association VP-environmental affairs. More recently, the Pacific Asia Travel Association (PATA) and the International Air Transport Association (IATA) have also publicly criticized the tax.

In addition to the concerns about decreasing air travel, many fear that the tax will prompt travelers to drive to airports in other countries, therefore generating more emissions.

Supporters of the tax claim that there no evidence to indicate that an aviation tax will have any impact on travel volumes. Those same supporters point to statistics that indicate that air travel will continue to increase, and there is no question that air travel emits far more greenhouse gasses on a per mile basis

Supporters also question why travel agencies and governments do not question the actions of oil companies, when in record breaking years for profits, the price of fuel has nearly tripled.

What do you think? Fair or foul?

{ 1 comment }