Posts tagged as:

Harrisburg

Philadelphia is a town known for its scrappy sports teams and its passionate fans. We’ve collectively cheered our world champion Phillies and wrung our hands over last minute Eagles’ losses. We’ve booed the drafting of Donovan McNabb, cheered Brad Lidge, mourned our beloved Harry Kalas and thrown snowballs at Santa. We’ve stood along Kelly Drive and screamed for half-marathoner Ryan Hall and cyclist George Hincapie and endeavored to catch a glimpse of Bill Cosby at the Penn Relays.

It’s rare that the worlds of sports and art collide in Philly in any kind of remarkable way. Until last month, the biggest challenge as between the two was figuring out where to put the infamous Rocky statue: it’s not quite art but reportedly, art museum attendance plummeted when the statue was moved to the sports complex. (It’s now back home at the museum.)

But that was before Harrisburg got involved. The state budget deal, which allowed Philadelphia to increase its sales tax by a penny in an effort to keep the city going, has one teensy little provision that’s getting quite a bit of press: an extension of the state sales tax to cultural performances and venues. Cultural performances and venues applies to the arts and music – but not to sports or movies. So yes to taxing the Cezanne exhibit at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, no to taxing “Zombieland” at the cinema. Hmm.

The deal would call for the creation of a special new fund for cultural institutions and the arts, including museums, orchestras, dance venues, theaters and zoos, previously budgeted as part of the general fund. Money from the general fund to the arts has already been cut due to budgetary restrictions and some venues, like historical museums and sites, have seen their budgets eliminated.

The idea is that *some percentage* of the the new tax (lawmakers have been silent as to the exact amount) would be used to establish the fund – it’s a bit unclear where the rest of the money would go. State Republicans, who had previously opposed new taxes, insisted on the tax expansion in reaction to revenue shortfalls. Supporters of the arts looked to Gov. Rendell (D) for help, but he suggested that tax increases were inevitable, with his spokesman claiming “we cannot do a budget without pain.”

In a cash strapped year, with revenues down, cuts are to be expected. Many in the City, myself included, admitted that they would prefer to see an expansion of the sales tax to save the arts over cutting other services, like police. But why not movies and sporting events?

One city resident that I spoke with suggested that it felt like “rural Pennsylvania’s chance to thumb its nose at the City” since a majority of the tax would be created and spent in Philadelphia. An interesting take, for sure, but not quite accurate. The tax would apply across the board to arts and cultural venues in the state. It would not just affect the Philadelphia Museum of Art and the Pennsylvania Ballet but also the Elmwood Zoo and the Michener Art Museum. It would not, however, affect the Eagles or the Steelers. You have to wonder why not.

Groups across the state have been working to scale back the tax expansion with varying amounts of luck. There have been, at times, rumors that the tax may now exclude nonprofits but include for profits; that zoos and museums may be excluded; that concerts at stadiums may be included but those at an actual hall may not… Rumors, all, and nothing substantiated. In fact, at this point, we’re not at all quite sure what will come out of any compromise bill.

Of course, it’s worth noting that our neighbor to the north, New York, decided not to tack on an additional tax for tickets after those who worked in the arts noted the domino effect that the tax might have. Reduced ticket sales means fewer customers for restaurants, hotels and retail shops. Fewer customers means lost revenue – lost revenue means layoffs. Layoffs mean less wage and income taxes. You get the picture.

It’s easy to think that tax cuts – and tax increases – happen in a vacuum but they don’t. Taxes are an integral part of our day to day lives. How we choose to prioritize those taxes, I think, says a lot about us.

{ 0 comments }

Philadelphia joined a host of other cities and towns – as well as states – across the nation hanging up “closed” signs on government funded institutions. Just months after Chicago ordered non-unionized employees to take unpaid furloughs and Hawaii warned of state employee furloughs, signs on Philadelphia public libraries and recreation centers warned of impending shut downs. The Free Library of Philadelphia, which once held the world’s largest circulation of books, warned:

As a result of the state budget crisis and legislation impasse, the entire Free Library of Philadelphia system is set to close October 2nd.

So, how did it come to this? Shutting down libraries, recreation centers, and other services? These shut downs are on top of other recent shutdowns (including my local firehouse).

Of course, there’s a budget crisis. Not enough revenue coming in. We get it, we’ve heard similar horror stories in other places. The recession has hit state and local coffers hard – not a day goes by practically that you don’t hear the Governors of New Jersey or California warning about budget shortfalls.

But in Philly, we have something worse than revenue shortfalls: the dreaded “legislation impasse.” And here’s how it works…

Philly needed extra revenue. After considering a host of options, Council and the Mayor agreed to a “temporary” (*cough*) increase in the sales tax of 1%. In Pennsylvania, the sales tax rate is currently 6% with a 1% increase in Philadelphia. So if you spend your dollars in Philly (and we certainly hope that you do), you pay 7% sales tax. With the additional increase, Pennsylvania sales tax would remain at 6% but Philadelphia sales tax would increase to 8%. Even with the additional increase, the sales tax would remain below that of other major cities, including Chicago, New York City and Los Angeles.

So, with that in mind, everyone nodded agreeably and the proposal was made to the Commonwealth that the sales tax be increased. Under the Pennsylvania Charter, increases in sales tax must be approved by the state legislature. Philadelphia submitted its proposal and held its breath.

The legislation was approved in the House. The increase would allow Philadelphia to raise its sales tax and temporarily defer pension payments. When it made it to the Senate, the legislation was amended to allow the state to step in and manage “Level 3 distressed municipal pensions.” Level 3 pensions are those funded at less than 50% – in Pennsylvania, currently Pittsburgh fits that bill, coming in at just 31% funded. The Senate also insisted on a pension freeze and reductions in benefits for incoming municipal workers.

And that’s where the sales tax increase got de-railed. The GOP won’t vote yes on the sales tax increase unless the other concessions are included. The Democrats, facing considerable pressure from organized labor, won’t agree to include the cost-cutting provisions. The result? A legislative impasse.

What’s a legislator to do? Here’s a thought: make them separate issues.

The GOP and the Dems both agree on a sales tax increase for Philly. City Council and the Mayor agree on a sales tax increase for Philly. Should be end of story.

But politicians like the idea of leverage. They like the notion that they can hold bills hostage while tacking on new, controversial and generally unrelated measures (that’s why, for example, the credit card reform bill that passed Congress this fall included language to allow concealed weapons in national parks). And so Senate Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi (R – Del) has said that there will be no compromise to split the bill.

Hey, I like Pittsburgh – but what does their distressed pension system have to do with my Philadelphia sales tax? Exactly. Nothing.

So, while legislators in Harrisburg argue about pension plans and benefits for union workers, signs are being tacked up on libraries announcing closures. Trash pick up may be reduced in the City. Letters informing workers that they’ve been let go are going out next week (a good friend has advised that her entire department will be receiving them). The Fire Commissioner will announce six engine and three ladder companies, plus five medic units, which will close. Two health centers are closing. Thanks, Harrisburg.

If you live in Philly, you should be angry. Angry that this has been allowed to happen. And if you live further afield – whether in West Chester or Pittsburgh – or even in Boise, Idaho, you should be concerned that so much of our tax policy has nothing to do with taxes at all: it’s about politics.

{ 7 comments }

Whoops. The folks in Harrisburg are calling it an honest mistake but taxpayers aren’t buying it.

They approved a property-tax increase that was higher than allowed by a 2006 law aimed at cutting homeowners’ property taxes.

The state Education Department has ordered the district to return about $60,000 in excess taxes which were paid under a new law. There’s just one problem: the law requires school districts to keep tax increases within an inflationary index unless they receive permission to exceed it. Harrisburg didn’t get permission. By law, Harrisburg was supposed to limit the rate increase to 5.1% and instead raised taxes by 5.28%.

Harrisburg superintendent Gerald Kohn said “I am embarrassed that we made this mistake, and we will assure that this mistake will not occur again.”

Kohn is not the only superintendent grappling with new math: Bermudian Springs, Penn-Delco, Northern Cambria and Elizabethtown Area all made mathematical errors in their indexes. However, Education Secretary Gerald Zahorchak made it plain that of the five districts, only Harrisburg’s over-taxing was deliberate.

{ 0 comments }