Posts tagged as:

Huckabee

Welcome to my fourth in a series on state taxes! For information about what I’m trying to do, read my introductory bit. Next on the agenda, the bane of every elementary aged school child when it comes to spelling: Arkansas!

ARKANSAS

Population: 2,834,797 (32nd)

Capital: Little Rock

Largest City: Little Rock

Gross Domestic Product: $87 billion

GDP per capita: $27,875 (49th)

2008 election winner: John McCain

web site: http://www.state.ar.us/

Income Tax

Arkansas does collect personal income tax. Taxes are fixed according to a series of six brackets, depending on net income. For 2007, the brackets are:

    If net income is at least $0, but not more than $3,699, the tax rate is 1%;
    If net income is at least $3,700, but not more than $7,399, the tax rate is 2.5% minus $55.49;
    If net income is at least $7,400, but not more than $11,099, the tax rate is 3.5% minus $129.48;
    If net income is at least $11,100, but not more than $18,599, the tax rate is 4.5% minus $240.47;
    If net income is at least $18,600, but not more than $30,999, the tax rate is 6% minus $519.45; and
    If net income is $31,000 or more, the tax rate is 7% minus $829.44

There is a separate Low Income Tax Table which may be used in certain circumstances. Beginning in 2007, the Low Income Tax Table offers a full exemption to those with income below the federal poverty level. There is additional tax relief for taxpayers earning less than 133% of the federal poverty level income.

Arkansas residents are generally taxed on the same income that they report for federal income tax purposes. However, Social Security benefits, VA benefits, Workers’ Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, Railroad Retirement benefits and related benefits are exempt from tax. Additionally, there is a $6,000 exemption on taxable retirement income and a $9,000 exemption on military income per taxpayer.

Arkansas has an odd set of rules related to capital gains. Briefly, 30% of net capital gains are excluded from income with the remaining 70% treated as ordinary income. Short-term capital gains (held less than one year) are 100% taxable as ordinary income.

One interesting addition: beginning in 2007, Arkansas imposed a 3% flat tax on winnings from “electronic games of skill” (really, games of chance but the legislature has outlawed most of those – nonetheless, slots and the like are considered games of skill). Winnings which are taxed at 3% are not otherwise included as income to the taxpayer.

Some of the specific disallowed deductions for medical expenses were pretty funny… I mean, who doesn’t think that ear piercing should be disallowed as a medical expense? But apparently some folks do since it made it onto the list. Also on the list? Tattoos, maternity clothes, “spiritual guidance” (not kidding) and a gravestone. Note to residents of Arkansas: if you’re purchasing a gravestone, no further medical deductions are necessary. Just saying.

And those Arkansas politicians aren’t stupid: on your Arkansas tax return, you may take political contributions as a tax credit (up to $50 per individual and $100 per couple) in each tax year.

Arkansas does participate in the Set Off program. An Arkansas state tax refund will be taken to satisfy any outstanding liabilities owed to the State of Arkansas or to the Internal Revenue Service; a federal refund will be taken for same.

Sales Tax.

Arizona sales tax is 6%. Some cities and counties may add a local sales tax, bringing the rate to as high as 8.5-9% across the state.

Sales tax is imposed on most retail goods and some services. Sales of food are taxed at a reduced rate of 3%. Prepared food and dietary supplements are taxed at 6%.

An additional mixed drink tax of 10% is imposed on the sale of alcoholic beverages (excluding beer) at restaurants. A 4% tax is imposed on the sale of all mixed drinks (except beer and wine) sold for “on-premises” consumption. There is a 3% “off premises” tax on retail sales of liquor and wine, and an additional 1% tax on sales of beer.

Sales of prescription medicines are exempt from sales tax. Additionally, sales of insulin and test strips for diabetes testing are exempt from sales tax.

Tobacco Tax

Arkansas’ tax rate on cigarettes is a low $.59 for a package of twenty cigarettes, ranking them 33rd in the country. The national average is $1.14 per pack.

There is a proposal – being met with much resistance – to raise the tax on cigarettes by $.50 in 2009.

Gas Tax

The gas tax rate in Arkansas is $.218 per gallon (the 19th lowest in the country).

Property Taxes

In Arkansas the property tax generates revenue for school districts (77%), county (15%) and city governments (8%). Additional special district taxes may apply.

In 2002, property taxes accounted for 16% of Arkansas’ state and local tax revenue, about half the national average of 31%. Only five states (West Virginia, Kentucky, Alabama, New Mexico and Louisiana) rely less on property taxes than Arkansas (source: US Census).

The average 2003 property tax rate was tax rate of $47.81 for every $1,000 of assessed property (source: Arkansas Assessment Coordination Dept).

Inheritance and Estate Tax

Arkansas does not impose an inheritance tax or a gift tax. Like most states, Arkansas no longer has an estate tax since it was tied to the federal estate tax state death tax credit.

Miscellaneous Tax

As a beauty pageant girl (see, there’s lots about taxgirl that you didn’t know), I couldn’t let the miscellaneous tax for “beauty pageant registration fees” go by without a mention. Rates vary.

There is also a soft drink tax collected by every distributor, manufacturer, or wholesale dealer in Arkansas (sorry Dad).

Overall Tax Burden

The overall tax burden in Arkansas, taking into account taxes paid by individuals, results in a ranking as 14th most-tax burdened state in the country, according to Tax Foundation. Arkansas’ tax burden ranking has been dropping for a number of years – many pundits credit former Governor Huckabee.

taxgirl says

Arkansas is an interesting state when it comes to taxes. Like Alabama, it has a relatively low GDP per capita. Yet, the tax burden by percentage is higher than the national average.

And it’s not just the numbers. The income tax structure is overly complicated – six tiers? Really? With a span of 1% to 7%? That’s a big difference. And a top rate of 7% puts Arkansas near the top of the country in terms of maximum tax rates.

The sales tax system is regressive. Taxes on food – including groceries and prepared foods – are generally most difficult for those with lower incomes. The sales tax rate also stands above the national average. Overall, Arkansas is a low income state. A regressive, high sales tax a low income state seems a bit incongruous. Interestingly, many organizations in Arkansas have protested an increase in the cigarette tax with the regressive tax argument – I wonder why there isn’t much outcry about the existing sales tax?

Even with a relatively high tax burden, Arkansas still depends on the feds for extra funding. Like Alabama (but unlike Arizona), Arkansas taxpayers receive more in federal funding per dollar of federal taxes paid than the average state. In 2005, Arkansas citizens received approximately $1.41 of federal spending for every $1.15 paid to the Treasury.

When it comes to property taxes, Arkansas can boast some of the lowest in the nation. Since the schools are the biggest recipient of property tax dollars, you’d expect education to suffer. Yet, Arkansas sits more or less in the middle of high school graduation rates (source: Manhattan Institute). This means one of two things: either Arkansas receives federal funding to put towards its schools or increased school dollars don’t always correlate to educational success. I haven’t been able to figure out which.

So, low property taxes, regressive sales taxes and income taxes that are all over the place. It’s hard to characterize Arkansas’ tax structure other than to say that the overall burden remains relatively high compared to taxpayer income. As federal dollars certainly shrink, it will be interesting to see how Arkansas compensates: you can’t get blood from a stone.

Anyone from Arkansas want to chime in? I’m curious to hear whether Governor Beebe is a popular choice in a post-Huckabee economy…

(Note: tax rates were current as of 12-28-2008 and were taken from the AR Department of Revenue web site unless otherwise noted.)

{ 12 comments }

It’s Fix the Tax Code Friday!

The IRS has become more aggressive during this election year about enforcing the prohibition against politicking by tax exempt organizations. To date, the IRS has made inquiries into charitable organizations who have supported or opposed candidates including Obama, Romney and Huckabee.

Is this good policy – or is the IRS too harsh? Today’s Fix the Tax Code Friday question is:

Should charitable organizations (and thus, tax exempt) be prohibited from politicking? Should some measure of involvement in political campaigns be allowed?

{ 3 comments }

picApp_publisherId = 447;picApp_imageId = 1786;picApp_imageWidth = 357;picApp_imageHeight = 260;picApp_configUrl = “http://pis.picapp.com/IamProd/FlashSite/GetConfig.aspx”;picApp_Picview=”http://pis.picapp.com/IamProd/FlashSite/en/picviewerv1_1.swf”;picapp_numberOfLine=2;ImageServe();

The IRS is serious about the rules which prohibit non-profit organizations, including churches, from supporting candidates or political parties.

Just a few week after the IRS mailed a lengthy letter to First Baptist Church of Buena Park pastor Wiley S. Drake advising that he was being investigated for his 2007 support of presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee, Obama’s denomination, United Church of Christ, has announced that it had been contacted by the IRS. The IRS is investigating UCC with respect to a speech that Senator Obama made at the UCC national meeting in 2007.

The IRS has notified the UCC that “reasonable belief exists” that the circumstances surrounding the speech violated the rules. Specifically, the IRS is concerned about articles posted on the church’s web site about the speech and the fact that Obama volunteers were stationed “outside the center to promote his campaign.” You can read the letter in its entirety here downloadable as a pdf.

The church claims that it consulted with lawyers before the event to ensure compliance with the rules. Additionally, the crowd was advised beforehand by Edith Guffey, administrator of the 2007 UCC General Synod, that the speech would not be “campaign-related” and that no campaign materials or other overt signs of support related to the political campaign would be allowed. The church also noted that Obama was asked to speak at the event before he announced his candidacy for President, and that the invitation was related to Obama’s involvement in his church and not his candidacy.

But does that make it alright?

Much of the criticism from the speech is related to Obama’s remarks about the misuse of faith in America. He specifically referenced the Christian right, traditionally the GOP voter base, in his speech.

The IRS has not commented on the investigation since it is ongoing. But it will be interesting to see what the result will be since this is an investigation of an entire denomination – comprised of 1.2 million churchgoers – as opposed to a single church, which is more traditional.

What do you think? Is this on par with Drake’s email? Worse?

You can read the entire transcript of Obama’s speech after the jump if you’re interested.

[click to continue…]

{ 4 comments }

Elections are supposed to be about candidates. And candidates want endorsements. But not every organization is allowed to make a public endorsement of a political candidate. Specifically, organizations that are tax-exempt – including churches, schools and purely public charities – may not endorse candidates, raise funds for candidates or distribute statements for or against candidates.

The IRS has, in prior years, warned tax-exempt organizations about the kinds of activities which are acceptable – and those that are not. In 2006, the Service was particularly proactive following a slew of complaints stemming from the 2004 presidential elections.

And yet, for the 2008 elections, there continues to be public support for candidates by leaders of tax-exempt organizations (most commonly, churches) on both sides of the aisle.

Last year, liveprayer.com found itself in the spotlight when it touted that “a vote for Mitt Romney is a vote for Satan.” This mattered because LivePrayer is under the umbrella of Bill Keller Ministries, a fully tax-exempt, 501(c)(3) organization.

And now, First Baptist Church of Buena Park pastor Wiley S. Drake is under fire for endorsing Mike Huckabee for president. Drake made a public statement in August 2007, released on church letterhead, exhorting his followers to likewise vote for Huckabee:

After very serious prayer and consideration, I announce that I am going to personally endorse Mike Huckabee. I ask all of my Southern Baptist brothers and sisters to consider getting behind Mike and helping him all you can. First of all pray and then ask God, what should I do to put feet to my prayers.

Do what God tells you to do. I believe God has chosen Mike for such an hour, and I believe of all those running Mike Huckabee will listen to God.

In response, the Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed a complaint with the IRS, citing the prohibition against publicly endorsing a candidate.

What’s a “good” Christian to do? Pray that bad things happen to other people.

Oh yeah.

Pastor Drake issued a “Media Advisory” which urged:

In light of the recent attack from the enemies of God I ask the children of God to go into action with Imprecatory Prayer. Especially against Americans United for Separation of Church and State. I made an attempt to go to them via Matt 18:15 but they refused to talk to me. Specifically target Joe Conn or Jeremy Learing. They are those who lead the attack.

And it didn’t stop there. Last week, Pastor Drake was made aware that the IRS is now investigating the political activities of the church in response to his endorsement of Huckabee. He issued, via email , a second call for Imprecatory Prayer against the Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the American Civil Liberties Union.
In both emails, Drake quoted Psalm 109. Here is the text of Psalm 109:2-20:

O God, whom I praise, do not be silent, for wicked and treacherous mouths attack me. They speak against me with lying tongues; with hateful words they surround me, attacking me without cause. In return for my love they slander me, even though I prayed for them. They repay me evil for good, hatred for my love. My enemies say of me: “Find a lying witness, an accuser to stand by his right hand, That he may be judged and found guilty, that his plea may be in vain. May his days be few; may another take his office. May his children be fatherless, his wife, a widow. May his children be vagrant beggars, driven from their hovels. May the usurer snare all he owns, strangers plunder all he earns. May no one treat him kindly or pity his fatherless children. May his posterity be destroyed, his name cease in the next generation. May the LORD remember his fathers’ guilt; his mother’s sin not be canceled. May their guilt be always before the LORD, till their memory is banished from the earth, For he did not remember to show kindness, but hounded the wretched poor and brought death to the brokenhearted. He loved cursing; may it come upon him; he hated blessing; may none come to him. May cursing clothe him like a robe; may it enter his belly like water, seep into his bones like oil. May it be near as the clothes he wears, as the belt always around him.”

May the LORD bring all this upon my accusers, upon those who speak evil against me.

On a professional level, it is distressing that any organization – religious or otherwise – would respond to complaints against its business practices by “calling out” the opposition. An appropriate response would be to fight the allegations in a rational, thoughtful manner. But apparently, Pastor Drake is neither.

On a personal level, it cheapens religion to turn a criticism into a call for intolerance. I don’t care what your religious or political beliefs are. Just stay within the law when you’re touting them.

For the record, I believe in God and I was raised Southern Baptist – I think that’s an important context for my post. I don’t believe in attacking religion for the sake of attacking religion any more than I believe in attacking individuals in the name of spite.

You can say what you want about our political candidates – be it Obama, Clinton, Huckabee or McCain. I don’t happen to believe that God has a favorite in mind, no matter what Pastor Drake says. But if I did, I could say it here on the blog if I wanted. If I did, I might be criticized, but I wouldn’t be breaking the rules.

(Hat Tip: TaxProf blog)

And if you like this post, you can digg it:
digg_url = ‘http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/If_You_Don_t_Like_What_I_Have_To_Say_About_Huckabee’;

{ 21 comments }

Huckabee on the Fair Tax

12 September 2007

Gov Huckabee is a huge proponent of the Fair Tax. He made this clear when I emailed his staff earlier this year with questions – and then again when I interviewed him by phone.
Here’s his debate response to criticisms of the plan:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U91xMCurBEw]

0 comments Read the full article →

If I Were President…

29 May 2007

Oh, don’t even get me started.
But there are a number of folks who are actually making a run at it this year, some expected and some, well, not.
I have contacted each of the candidates several times to ask their positions on various tax issues. And a number of them responded promptly and their replies [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Tax Talk 2007: Mike Huckabee

23 May 2007

Our next presidential candidate to be featured in our series of interviews is Mike Huckabee, a Republican and former Governor of Arkansas.
I posed the following six tax-related questions to the Governor:
1. What’s the single most important tax issue facing Americans today?
2. If you could only make one “quick fix” in terms of an extra credit, [...]

5 comments Read the full article →

When A Candidate A-tax

16 May 2007

I know, it’s a cheesy title, but I’m banging this out in the middle of a really busy day. Notwithstanding the Philadelphia primaries yesterday (for which I fully intend to follow-up with some en pointe tax questions), I was on the phone this morning with Governor Huckabee’s office getting some good feedback on his [...]

0 comments Read the full article →