The IRS has issued some guidance on the “Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save” (Cash for Clunkers program).
President Obama signed the bill into law on June 24, 2009 (you can download the bill here as a pdf). It’s basically a vehicle trade-in and purchase program (leases for more than 5 years work, too): you can receive up to $3500-$4500 in credits for trading in less fuel efficient vehicles. Different rules apply for different vehicles.
To qualify, your old vehicle must have been manufactured less than 25 years before the date you trade it in (that means it’s a ‘no’ for our Fiat Spyder – it turns 33 this year!); have a “new” combined city/highway fuel economy of 18 miles per gallon or less; be in drivable condition and be continuously insured and registered to the same owner for the full year preceding the trade-in. In other words, clunker or not, it must have been in use.
A new vehicle must, before any features, options, taxes, or destination charges are added to the price, have a MSRP or $45,000 or less. New cars must have a combined fuel economy value of at least 22 mpg; category 1 trucks must have a combined fuel economy value of at least 18 mpg; and category 2 trucks must have a combined fuel economy value of at least 15 mpg. There are no minimum mpg requirements for category 3 trucks but other restrictions apply. To get a feel for the mpg of various vehicles, you can check out the fuel economy web site (in case you’re wondering, when it comes to passenger cars, the Toyota Prius gets the best mileage overall, according to the site, and the Lamborghini Murcielago gets the worst mileage).
So, what does any of this have to do with tax? Well, on the individual tax side, nothing, since you can’t normally deduct the cost of your personal use vehicle (though don’t forget about the new car sales tax deduction). And the credit is like a discount, really, and doesn’t count as income to the buyer for tax purposes.
But on the corporate side, there was a lot of confusion. The credits for the vehicles are government funded: if the dealer meets all of the requirements, including crushing or disposing of the old cars, NHTSA will repay the dealer. The dealer must apply the credit amount to the customer. So it’s a wash really on the dealer’s side: it’s as if the credit never happened. Think about it: dealer sells $25,000 car to customer less $3,000 credit. NHTSA gives dealer $3,000. Dealer still walks away with $25,000.
So what does that mean when it comes to taxes on the dealer’s side? Normally, for tax purposes, gross receipts for the dealer include the full selling price of the vehicle. Since the credit is reimbursed to the dealer, it’s considered part of the selling price and is includible in the dealer’s gross receipts in the year that the vehicle is sold. With respect to expenses, if a dealer incurs any business expenses related to the disposal of the old vehicles, those expenses are deductible.
This is really a win-win for dealers. They are offering a “sale” to consumers for which they don’t take a hit. And since it doesn’t affect their bottom line, it doesn’t change their tax situation.
It’s a good idea for dealers to keep good records to back up claims for income and expenses… And do it quickly. It looks like, even with additional funding, this program won’t last long.
Taxpayer asks:
hi taxgirl , i have a question, i bought a 2009 nissan on january 17 2009,do i qualify for the sales tax deduction?
Taxgirl says:
Don’t hate me but no. The law says that the new car must be purchased after February 16, 2009 and before January 1, 2010, to qualify for the deduction.
But hey, look on the bright side… It’s not a Chrysler.
Like any good lawyer, I need to add a disclaimer: Unfortunately, it is impossible to give comprehensive tax advice over the internet, no matter how well researched or written. Before relying on any information given on this site, contact a tax professional to discuss your particular situation.
Have a question? Ask the taxgirl! – Now on Facebook!
The good news under ARRA (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009): if you buy a qualifying new vehicle after February 16, 2009, and before January 1, 2010, you can deduct state or local sales or excise taxes paid on the purchase. The deduction is available whether or not you itemize.
The bad news under ARRA: prior to June 10, if you live in Alaska, Delaware, Hawaii, Montana, New Hampshire and Oregon, you were out of luck in the federal tax break department since those states don’t charge sales tax.
The luck of residents in sales tax free states seems to be changing. The IRS has announced that taxpayers who buy a qualifying new car in those states may deduct other fees or taxes imposed by the state or local government so long as they are assessed on the purchase of the vehicle and are based on the vehicle’s sales price or as a per unit fee. According to the IRS, that was Congress’ plan all along… they just, er, didn’t get around to putting it in the bill.
IRS Commish Doug Shulman says:
This special tax break is available for people purchasing a new car this year, and that can include people in states without a sales tax. This means that more people can take advantage of this deduction when they file their tax returns next year.
As a reminder, the deduction is limited to fees or taxes paid on up to $49,500 of the purchase price of a qualified new car, light truck, motor home or motorcycle. (Motor home, Chris! Are you reading?) The deduction is subject to phase outs for taxpayers whose modified adjusted gross income is between $125,000 and $135,000 for individuals and between $250,000 and $260,000 for married couples.
Of course, it makes sense that it would take the IRS four months to figure out what Congress really meant to say. The announcement was made on June 10 (yesterday). And it has nothing to do with the government now owning a piece of Chrysler…
Taxpayer asks:
Hi there,
I’ve purchased a new vehicle in 2009 on Jan. 31. The original provision of the new bill that was passed by the Senate stated that it would be from mid November 2008 through Jan. 1, 2010.
I saw your response where Congress has now said that new vehicles purchased from Feb. 16, 2009 to Jan. 1, 2010 are eligible.
Do I have any recourse or do you think it will be ammended to include the full year, i.e. from Jan. 1, 2009 to Jan. 1, 2010?
I was hoping for the tax brake and feel that its not fair to consumers.
Taxgirl says:
I’ve heard this question a lot. Unfortunately, I don’t have good news for you. I don’t think it’s going to be amended. It feels like an arbitrary date (it was the date that ARRA was effective) but it was written specifically to be effective for those dates. And yeah, it stinks. You can never trust anything that Congress tosses around until the ink is dry…
Like any good lawyer, I need to add a disclaimer: Unfortunately, it is impossible to give comprehensive tax advice over the internet, no matter how well researched or written. Before relying on any information given on this site, contact a tax professional to discuss your particular situation.
Have a question? Ask the taxgirl! – Now on Facebook!