Posts tagged as:

sports

Philadelphia is a town known for its scrappy sports teams and its passionate fans. We’ve collectively cheered our world champion Phillies and wrung our hands over last minute Eagles’ losses. We’ve booed the drafting of Donovan McNabb, cheered Brad Lidge, mourned our beloved Harry Kalas and thrown snowballs at Santa. We’ve stood along Kelly Drive and screamed for half-marathoner Ryan Hall and cyclist George Hincapie and endeavored to catch a glimpse of Bill Cosby at the Penn Relays.

It’s rare that the worlds of sports and art collide in Philly in any kind of remarkable way. Until last month, the biggest challenge as between the two was figuring out where to put the infamous Rocky statue: it’s not quite art but reportedly, art museum attendance plummeted when the statue was moved to the sports complex. (It’s now back home at the museum.)

But that was before Harrisburg got involved. The state budget deal, which allowed Philadelphia to increase its sales tax by a penny in an effort to keep the city going, has one teensy little provision that’s getting quite a bit of press: an extension of the state sales tax to cultural performances and venues. Cultural performances and venues applies to the arts and music – but not to sports or movies. So yes to taxing the Cezanne exhibit at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, no to taxing “Zombieland” at the cinema. Hmm.

The deal would call for the creation of a special new fund for cultural institutions and the arts, including museums, orchestras, dance venues, theaters and zoos, previously budgeted as part of the general fund. Money from the general fund to the arts has already been cut due to budgetary restrictions and some venues, like historical museums and sites, have seen their budgets eliminated.

The idea is that *some percentage* of the the new tax (lawmakers have been silent as to the exact amount) would be used to establish the fund – it’s a bit unclear where the rest of the money would go. State Republicans, who had previously opposed new taxes, insisted on the tax expansion in reaction to revenue shortfalls. Supporters of the arts looked to Gov. Rendell (D) for help, but he suggested that tax increases were inevitable, with his spokesman claiming “we cannot do a budget without pain.”

In a cash strapped year, with revenues down, cuts are to be expected. Many in the City, myself included, admitted that they would prefer to see an expansion of the sales tax to save the arts over cutting other services, like police. But why not movies and sporting events?

One city resident that I spoke with suggested that it felt like “rural Pennsylvania’s chance to thumb its nose at the City” since a majority of the tax would be created and spent in Philadelphia. An interesting take, for sure, but not quite accurate. The tax would apply across the board to arts and cultural venues in the state. It would not just affect the Philadelphia Museum of Art and the Pennsylvania Ballet but also the Elmwood Zoo and the Michener Art Museum. It would not, however, affect the Eagles or the Steelers. You have to wonder why not.

Groups across the state have been working to scale back the tax expansion with varying amounts of luck. There have been, at times, rumors that the tax may now exclude nonprofits but include for profits; that zoos and museums may be excluded; that concerts at stadiums may be included but those at an actual hall may not… Rumors, all, and nothing substantiated. In fact, at this point, we’re not at all quite sure what will come out of any compromise bill.

Of course, it’s worth noting that our neighbor to the north, New York, decided not to tack on an additional tax for tickets after those who worked in the arts noted the domino effect that the tax might have. Reduced ticket sales means fewer customers for restaurants, hotels and retail shops. Fewer customers means lost revenue – lost revenue means layoffs. Layoffs mean less wage and income taxes. You get the picture.

It’s easy to think that tax cuts – and tax increases – happen in a vacuum but they don’t. Taxes are an integral part of our day to day lives. How we choose to prioritize those taxes, I think, says a lot about us.

{ 0 comments }

Taxpayer asks:


I saw on twitter that you ran a race this year so maybe you can help me. I run a number of races throughout the year and I occasionally win some money. My friend told me that I have to include that money on my taxes. Can I deduct the cost of the entry fee against the money that I won?

Taxgirl says:

2008 New York City Marathon

Yep, I ran my first race last year. It was the Rothman 8k as part of the Philadelphia Marathon. I am not a serious runner but I had a respectable finish. Actually, I was just glad to finish! ;)

As to your question, yes, your friend is right. You must report your winnings on your income taxes.

Here’s the tricky part: you must decide if your running is a business or a hobby. Since you said that you ran “a number of races” and only “occasionally” win some money, it sounds as though you run as a hobby. If running – or any other sport – is your hobby, then you would report winnings as “other income” (line 21 on your federal form 1040).

There is some good news. You can claim deductions against your winnings but only if you itemize. You would include your related running expenses as “miscellaneous itemized deductions” on your Schedule A (not on a Schedule C, that would only apply if running was your business). Expenses could include your entry fees, your running shoes and any other expenses which are directly related to running. Be aware that those miscellaneous itemized deductions are limited to those in excess of 2% of your AGI (adjusted gross income). For example, if your AGI was $40,000, you could only deduct expenses which were more than $800 (2% of $40,000). If you paid $1000 in entry fees and running shoes, you could actually deduct $200.

There are other limitations. If you treat running as a hobby, your deductions are limited to the amount of your winnings. Additionally, you can’t carry excess deductions forwards or backwards. So, if you’re like me and you pay an entry fee to run but don’t win anything, you can’t properly claim any running-related deductions. But that’s okay – I’m only running because I like it (so it’s a hobby). And for the shoes.

How can you tell if running is a hobby or a business for you? The IRS looks at a number of factors. In this case, there are two big factors which likely make running a hobby for you: your motive and your winnings. The IRS assumes that you’re in business to make money. It sounds, from your post, as if you run because you enjoy it and not to make money. There’s nothing that says that you can’t enjoy your business, but if you’re running primarily because you like it and not to make money as your main motive, it’s likely a hobby. Additionally, I’m guessing that you haven’t grossed more than you’ve spent for most of the last five years – the IRS assumes that a business will eventually make a profit. For more on the hobby rules, see my prior post about hobby income tests and Mary Kay.

There you go. Happy running!

(Psst. I plan to run a 5k on Mother’s Day as part of the Susan Komen Foundation Race for the Cure. If you’d like to follow my team’s progress or make a donation, you can visit our team page. It’s called Team Joye – in honor of my grandmother who had breast cancer.)

Like any good lawyer, I need to add a disclaimer: Unfortunately, it is impossible to give comprehensive tax advice over the internet, no matter how well researched or written. Before relying on any information given on this site, contact a tax professional to discuss your particular situation.

Have a question? Ask the taxgirl!Now on Facebook!

{ 2 comments }

A Free Ride?

February 16, 2006 · 0 comments

Guest Blogger: Madeline M. Martin

As almost anyone who knows me can attest, I am a college football fanatic. This time of year I usually focus my attention on recruiting. This month, February, is when high school seniors can formally commit.

It was recently reported throughout the sports media that Texas A&M recruit, Terrence McCoy, stated, upon signing with the Aggies:

“They take care of you down there,” McCoy said. “I know from my brother they keep your pockets full, give you plenty of money, keep feeding you meals. Besides that all the help they give you with football. They keep you on your grades with private tutoring. Just good all-around.”

So I began to wonder, what are the actual tax implications of “keeping your pockets full”? Even assuming that all of the “perks” are given according to NCAA regulations, it would seem that the new recruits should be made aware that some of these moneys would carry a tax burden.

According to Publication 520, A qualified scholarship or fellowship is any amount received as a scholarship or fellowship grant that is used under the terms of the grant for: Tuition and fees paid to enroll in, or to attend, an educational institution, or; fees, books, supplies, and equipment that are required for the courses at the educational institution. These items must be required of all students in the student’s course of instruction. However, an amount received for “incidental expenses” is not a tax-free qualified scholarship. Incidental expenses are expenses for items that are not required for either enrollment or attendance at an educational institution, or in a course of instruction at the educational institution. Incidental expenses include: room and board; travel; research; clerical help, and; equipment.

The “excess” amounts should be reported on the student’s 1040 and is taxed as ordinary income. But then I’m sure that the top schools have special accountant departments to help the kids out – yet another perk.

{ 0 comments }