Stretching his fifteen minutes even further, Richard Hatch of CBS’ "Survivor" went before a federal appeals court to argue against his conviction on tax evasion charges. Hatch was convicted of failing to pay taxes when he took home the $1 million prize on "Survivor. He was sentenced to more than four years in prison.
Defense lawyer Michael Minns argued on appeal that U.S. District Judge Ernest Torres improperly prevented him from pursuing a line of questioning regarding Hatch’s allegations that CBS promised to the pay taxes on the prize (CBS has denied those allegations). Federal prosecutors disagreed in their pleading, stating that Torres told Minns that he could present the evidence and that Minns chose not to do so.
While the "naked guy" (his "Survivor" tag) was acquitted on a number of charges relating to bank, mail and wire fraud charges related to his charity, Horizon Bound, he was convicted of tax evasion for more than $350,000 of income in additional to the $1 million prize.
And former "Survivor" winner Richard Hatch was found guilty of tax evasion on his "Survivor" winnings and other income. He was acquitted of other charges related to bank, mail and wire fraud charges.
The tribe, I mean, jury, deliberated for less than one day following a fairly brief trial of just over a week.
After the verdict, Hatch was taken into custody, deemed a potential flight risk by U.S. District Judge Ernest Torres.
Sentencing will be held on April 28. Hatch could spend up to 13 years in prison and face hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines.
The federal tax evasion trial of Richard Hatch, the first "Survivor" winner, is underway. You may recall that the reality star was charged with failing to report his million dollar winnings to the IRS, as well as other related charges.
Initially, Richard made an agreement with IRS and then withdrew his plea, claiming that CBS had agreed to pay the tax due. Confused?
Well, it gets better. His newest "defense" in the case is that Hatch struck a deal with the producers of "Survivor" wherein they would agree to pay the taxes due on his winnings if he didn’t reveal allegations of cheating on the show. Hmm. Isn’t that extortion? Granted, I’m a tax attorney, and not a criminal attorney, but I’ve always thought that withholding information about wrongdoing in exchange for cash was extortion. But, for kicks, let’s say it wasn’t. Let’s say that CBS really agreed to make the payment – which should be about $300,000. How do we classify that money? A gift? Definitely not. No donative intent. How about income?
We may never know. So far, U.S. District Judge Ernest Torres has failed to rule on whether Hatch can testify as to the deal. Hatch’s lawyer advised the Judge of his plans to present this information at trial on Friday, and it is not yet clear whether that will happen.
The twist has all of the elements of a classic "Survivor" moment – cheating, deceit, extortion and, of course, it was completely unexpected. So much so that, despite Mark Burnett’s prior turn on the witness stand, and months and months of trial preparation, this novel argument as to motivation has not surfaced until now.
If Hatch somehow manages to win the jury over on that argument, he still has other charges pending. Hatch is also accused of failing to pay taxes on hundreds of thousands of dollars of other income, such as appearances relating to his "Survivor" win, and improperly spending money donated to a charity that he founded.
But, of course, there’s an argument there, too. Hatch’s lawyer has argued that Hatch is the "world’s worst bookkeeper" and that the failure to pay taxes on that money is merely an oversight. Right. If you’ve ever been at the end of an IRS investigation, you know that the IRS gives you one, two, heck, in some cases, several opportunities to "settle up" any debts or omitted payments. I suspect that Hatch was notified on more than one occasion that he had not properly reported these payments. And if, as it appears his attorney is arguing, the failure to report income was simply an omission, why not pay up and move on? I’m a little confused as to why those arguments are even being made at the trial level.
All of that said, Hatch better hope that a jury is more sympathetic than me. If he is convicted, he could face up to 75 years in prison and millions of dollars in fines.
That hurts worse than having to walk around naked on the island, no?
