<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax on Internet Sales Not Likely to Pass&#8230; Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/tax-on-internet-sales-not-likely-to-pass-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/tax-on-internet-sales-not-likely-to-pass-again/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn't be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:33:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fix the Tax Code Friday: Taxing iTunes and Digital Music</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/tax-on-internet-sales-not-likely-to-pass-again/comment-page-1/#comment-6207</link>
		<dc:creator>Fix the Tax Code Friday: Taxing iTunes and Digital Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/tax-on-internet-sales-not-likely-to-pass-again/#comment-6207</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple is while I have purchased a lot music, I have not pay sales tax on those purchases. So far, despite efforts to the contrary, digital music is not taxed by the vendor (yes, yes, yes, there is a separate use tax issue here, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple is while I have purchased a lot music, I have not pay sales tax on those purchases. So far, despite efforts to the contrary, digital music is not taxed by the vendor (yes, yes, yes, there is a separate use tax issue here, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holy Zappos! New York is Collecting Sales Tax on Online Sales.</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/tax-on-internet-sales-not-likely-to-pass-again/comment-page-1/#comment-6208</link>
		<dc:creator>Holy Zappos! New York is Collecting Sales Tax on Online Sales.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/tax-on-internet-sales-not-likely-to-pass-again/#comment-6208</guid>
		<description>[...] online sales has been hyped before in California (for iTunes, no less) but didn&#8217;t get very far. The opposition to that tax raised many of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] online sales has been hyped before in California (for iTunes, no less) but didn&#8217;t get very far. The opposition to that tax raised many of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annette Nellen</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/tax-on-internet-sales-not-likely-to-pass-again/comment-page-1/#comment-6205</link>
		<dc:creator>Annette Nellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 03:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/tax-on-internet-sales-not-likely-to-pass-again/#comment-6205</guid>
		<description>Great points about expanding the California sales tax to cover digital goods. After all, it is a form of consumption and that is what is supposed to be taxed by the sales tax.  Also, California needs to update its tax base, rather than raise the already high rate as many people suggest in order to raise revenue.

Anne - Amazon doesn&#039;t have to collect sales tax in CA because it doesn&#039;t have &quot;nexus&quot; - a physical presence.  However, California buyers owe &quot;use tax&quot; at the same rate and you can report it on your CA income tax form 540.

iTunes doesn&#039;t need to collect sales tax from you and you don&#039;t owe use tax because what you are getting isn&#039;t &quot;tangible&quot; which is what CA sales tax applies to - &quot;tangible personal property.&quot; Some states interpret that term more broadly than does CA and some states have updated their law to include digital goods, such as New Jersey.

As we continue to consume more intangibles and services, and less tangible personal property, California&#039;s sales tax base erodes and is one of a few reasons that CA has budget problems.  CA needs to broaden the sales tax base, lower the rate and can even do that in a way that raises revenue if needed. I have more on this topic at a website I call &quot;21st century taxation&quot; which is what we need to do with our 20th century federal and state tax systems - move them into the 21st century ways of living and doing business.

http://www.cob.sjsu.edu/nellen_a/TaxReform/21st_century_taxation.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points about expanding the California sales tax to cover digital goods. After all, it is a form of consumption and that is what is supposed to be taxed by the sales tax.  Also, California needs to update its tax base, rather than raise the already high rate as many people suggest in order to raise revenue.</p>
<p>Anne &#8211; Amazon doesn&#8217;t have to collect sales tax in CA because it doesn&#8217;t have &#8220;nexus&#8221; &#8211; a physical presence.  However, California buyers owe &#8220;use tax&#8221; at the same rate and you can report it on your CA income tax form 540.</p>
<p>iTunes doesn&#8217;t need to collect sales tax from you and you don&#8217;t owe use tax because what you are getting isn&#8217;t &#8220;tangible&#8221; which is what CA sales tax applies to &#8211; &#8220;tangible personal property.&#8221; Some states interpret that term more broadly than does CA and some states have updated their law to include digital goods, such as New Jersey.</p>
<p>As we continue to consume more intangibles and services, and less tangible personal property, California&#8217;s sales tax base erodes and is one of a few reasons that CA has budget problems.  CA needs to broaden the sales tax base, lower the rate and can even do that in a way that raises revenue if needed. I have more on this topic at a website I call &#8220;21st century taxation&#8221; which is what we need to do with our 20th century federal and state tax systems &#8211; move them into the 21st century ways of living and doing business.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cob.sjsu.edu/nellen_a/TaxReform/21st_century_taxation.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cob.sjsu.edu/nellen_a/TaxReform/21st_century_taxation.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Wayman</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/tax-on-internet-sales-not-likely-to-pass-again/comment-page-1/#comment-6206</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Wayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/tax-on-internet-sales-not-likely-to-pass-again/#comment-6206</guid>
		<description>Kelly, as I understand it, Amazon and Land&#039;s End have decided to collect sales tax... that is, it isn&#039;t law... if I&#039;m right, why isn&#039;t Itunes doing the same thing? And do you know, if I buy a CD from Amazon, does California get the tax since that&#039;s where I am?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelly, as I understand it, Amazon and Land&#8217;s End have decided to collect sales tax&#8230; that is, it isn&#8217;t law&#8230; if I&#8217;m right, why isn&#8217;t Itunes doing the same thing? And do you know, if I buy a CD from Amazon, does California get the tax since that&#8217;s where I am?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
