<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update on the Federal Deficit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxgirl.com/update-on-the-federal-deficit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/update-on-the-federal-deficit/</link>
	<description>Paying taxes is painful... but reading about them shouldn't be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:16:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Congratulations! YOU saved Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac!</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/update-on-the-federal-deficit/comment-page-1/#comment-4233</link>
		<dc:creator>Congratulations! YOU saved Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/update-on-the-federal-deficit/#comment-4233</guid>
		<description>[...] Budget Office reported that the budget deficit will jump by $246 billion to $407 billion (actually a little bit less than predicted). Last year, the budget deficit was $161 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Budget Office reported that the budget deficit will jump by $246 billion to $407 billion (actually a little bit less than predicted). Last year, the budget deficit was $161 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iraq&#8217;s Oil Surplus Outpaces US Investment Dollars</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/update-on-the-federal-deficit/comment-page-1/#comment-4231</link>
		<dc:creator>Iraq&#8217;s Oil Surplus Outpaces US Investment Dollars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/update-on-the-federal-deficit/#comment-4231</guid>
		<description>[...] turns out that while the US has been facing record budget deficits, Iraq has been doing pretty well. US auditors have predicted a budget surplus of $80 billion in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] turns out that while the US has been facing record budget deficits, Iraq has been doing pretty well. US auditors have predicted a budget surplus of $80 billion in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urbie</title>
		<link>http://www.taxgirl.com/update-on-the-federal-deficit/comment-page-1/#comment-4232</link>
		<dc:creator>Urbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxgirl.com/update-on-the-federal-deficit/#comment-4232</guid>
		<description>Kelly,

Since GWB became essentially a non-entity (roughly as of the 2006 election, when his own party deserted him like rats off a sinking ship), it&#039;s been a non-stop feeding frenzy on the part of BOTH parties in Congress.  Neither party has shown any fiscal responsibility whatsoever -- for practical purposes, there&#039;s no one in the White House, so it&#039;s all about bringing home the bacon/pork/fat/whatever.  One hopes that, just as only a Republican could go to China, only a Democrat can balance the budget.  That proved to be the case with Clinton, and as this election is Obama&#039;s, provided he doesn&#039;t blow it or get Swift-Boated, we may see a return to lower deficits.  Frankly, though, I doubt it -- I think the best combination, for deficit reduction, was a Democrat in the White House with Republicans controlling Congress.  And that&#039;s out of the question, at least for this election cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelly,</p>
<p>Since GWB became essentially a non-entity (roughly as of the 2006 election, when his own party deserted him like rats off a sinking ship), it&#8217;s been a non-stop feeding frenzy on the part of BOTH parties in Congress.  Neither party has shown any fiscal responsibility whatsoever &#8212; for practical purposes, there&#8217;s no one in the White House, so it&#8217;s all about bringing home the bacon/pork/fat/whatever.  One hopes that, just as only a Republican could go to China, only a Democrat can balance the budget.  That proved to be the case with Clinton, and as this election is Obama&#8217;s, provided he doesn&#8217;t blow it or get Swift-Boated, we may see a return to lower deficits.  Frankly, though, I doubt it &#8212; I think the best combination, for deficit reduction, was a Democrat in the White House with Republicans controlling Congress.  And that&#8217;s out of the question, at least for this election cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
