Is A Second Economic Stimulus Package On Its Way?

2008 October 11

I indicated earlier that I didn’t think that a second economic stimulus package would be considered until after the elections - and it looks like that is, in fact, the case. I’m actually still confident that any stimulus package which includes “tax rebates” would not result in checks being mailed out until the new year.

Nonetheless, Democratic leaders have indicated that they will pursue a second economic stimulus package as soon as two weeks after the elections. The package is said to include extended jobless benefits, money for food stamps and maybe - just maybe - another tax rebate. The cost of the additional package is estimated to be $150 billion.

But talking is just that - talking. The real challenge is that even if the Democrats won the White House, any attempts at pushing new legislation next week means negotiations with the current President; most agree that President Bush, who remains in office through January 20, 2009, is not likely to agree on the House version of the bill as it is contemplated today.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi believes that some stimulus is necessary. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid agreed, saying:

“recent developments only reinforce the need for additional action to reinvigorate the economy.”

The House had passed a $61 billion economic stimulus package just before the election break but the package was never really intended to become law; the GOP Senate had already indicated opposition to the bill. That package included jobless benefits, Medicaid assistance and improvements to the nation’s infrastructure. There were no rebate checks included in that bill.

With respect to a new stimulus package, Republicans are said to be “skeptical of a second stimulus” but are not necessarily opposed. The main concern is the proposed cost of the plan, considering the state of the economy. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has reported that the federal government will run a near-record deficit of $407 billion this year and next year’s deficit could reach a record $438 billion. This does not include expenditures related to the bailout.

The Democrats in the Senate appear to echo the Republicans’ concern on some level. When speaking about a second stimulus package, Sen. Charles Schumer indicated support for a package that could range from $50 billion to $75 billion. A package of that size would almost certainly not include additional rebate checks.

So even if the House gets its way, don’t get too excited: all indications are that rebate checks would be limited. The last stimulus package included $100 billion of rebate checks and still left many taxpayers out completely. Even the “best case” scenarios being presented hint that a second round of rebate checks would total less than $65 billion, meaning that even more taxpayers would be left out of the second package.

It’s that last part that the Democrats have to keep in mind. The last round of checks left many angered that benefits were not extended to all taxpayers; to then extend a second round of benefits to fewer taxpayers (approximately 1/3 less) may cause widespread dissension.

What do you think? Good idea or not?

12 Comments leave one →
2008 October 11

[...] House Speaker Nancy Pelosi believes that some stimulus is necessary. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid agreed, saying:. “recent developments only reinforce the need for additional action to reinvigorate the economy.” …[Continue Reading] [...]

Pingback
2008 October 12

KPE

Say it isn’t so!

The first time Congress tried sending out “stimulus” rebate checks the end result was a mucking fess.

I am sure that when the dust settles next April the most recent program of rebate checks will prove to be just as mucking, if not more, of a fess.

To quote an anti-war anthem of my high school and college days – “When will they ever learn?”

TWTP

2008 October 13

[...] today, the GOP indicated that they are not on board with the Democrats’ proposal for a second economic stimulus package. There’s no surprise [...]

Pingback
2008 October 14
Another Tax Geek, CPA

The first one was a pretty dumb idea, this one is just moreso. Not surprising from Congress, we’ll get even more of this with the Dem’s controlling Congress and the White House. Oh well, it’ll be good for tax people, there’s no way they’ll simplify things.

2008 October 18

[...] House Speaker Nancy Pelosi confirmed yesterday that Congress is “unlikely” to approve an economic stimulus package that included tax rebate checks during this calendar [...]

Pingback
2008 October 23
Bill

lets give it all away to the corporations. The people
of the united states don’t really want a portion of their
tax dollars now do they. the house and senate are up there in washington to help Corporations “right” ?

2008 October 28
William Moriarty

To all the people that say the stimulus package is a bad idea, stupid, or however they decide to describe it, make sure to write “Return to Sender” on your check. Or, even better, call the Dept. of Treasury and let them know to NOT send you a check.

The rest of us Americans that have been laid off, had their hours/benefits cut, etc. will gladly accept any help that the Federal Government decides to give us.

2008 November 7

I Agree with William Moriarty.

2008 November 8
rachel

i agree with mr. moriarty.. i bet he ones who are against this second round of checks are the ones who would be first to ask where theirs is …
so as with mr. moriarty just hand it back to the mailman when you get yours and say no thanks i am rich enough and let people like me who work 8 to 10 to 12 hours a day to raise their kids have it

2008 November 9

I feel the americans should have a second stimulus check.Alot of folks are stuggling.
the takes that we pay goes for the roads.
we are not well off like Mr Moriaty if he is so concerned with the roads let him pay for the roads and let Americans have there checks.

2008 November 14
Jen sells

I dont know what Doris is saying??? Anyhow, as a mother of 3 and a mortgage paying, 12 hour a day working nurse, wife, and TAX PAYER, I feel that the stimulus checks are a great idea. I just wish that some of the “less fortunate” in our country would help themselves a little more. I feel that our country’s welfare programs are dragging us down, almost every state is burdenned by it. Where are the standards and rules and regulations for these people that get their doctor bills apid for and can go to the doctor for a hang nail anytime they wish? Where are the drug tests for the food stamp recipients? I have to have one. So yes help those of us who bust our backs, but for those who work 3 out of 12 months a year at McDonalds to qualify, give them what they are worth!

2008 November 15
Misty

I think that Americans could use more help from the government with a second stimulus check. Instead of them sending the money to other countries give it to there own country. However many people out here have the wrong idea about people who get welfare. I am a mother of two wonderful children and yes I do get foodstamps and medical but no I am not lazy and I do not just work enough in a year to quilify. Many people thinks that people on warefare are bums but that is not true. Yes there are some who are but there are others like me who are not.There is no jobs around me that pay more then 7.00 an hour and with working 40 hours a week at the jobs that hire for 40 hours a week you still do not make enough money to pay your bills and keep gas in the car to get to work and pay child care for your kids. So people should get your facts straight before you go bashing low income people who the only way to make it is to get help from the government.THEY ARE WORTH SOMETHING TOO.

Leave A Comment

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS