Congress Still Trying to Clean Up Housing Mess on Taxpayers’ Dime

2008 July 7

The Senate voted overwhelmingly (76-10) to advance a mortgage rescue plan to save hundreds of thousands of homeowners from foreclosure. The plan focuses on a $300 billion FHA program to allow homeowners who are currently considered too risky to qualify for government-backed loans to refinance into safer, more affordable mortgages.

The number of “yes” votes means that the bill would escape a veto from the White House. With this in mind, the White House is trying to work out a compromise with the Senate - specifics of a compromise are still not clear.

It is also not clear whether the package will clear the House. One issue that has not been agreed on between the Senate and House focuses on the limits on the mortgages FHA can insure and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy. The Senate measure caps the limits at $625,000 while the House version would impose a cap of $725,000. Those kind of caps, to me, are crazy. According to a report in the NY Times, the the median home price is $220,000. What kind of lenders are handing out loans to homeowners in excess of $625,000 without verifying ability to pay? I just don’t get it. Apparently, 76 members of Congress do.

5 Comments leave one →
2008 July 8
Casey

Since I was priced out of the housing market years ago, this is one of the few situations I will be glad to benefit from the ineffectiveness of our Government.

2008 July 8

Maybe they’re looking at Cali? Median prices are way higher here. But, yeah, they should’ve been a little more careful about qualifying people. As it is, I don’t stand a chance to buy a home here. And I don’t want to subsidize others getting in over their heads.

2008 July 9
Kim

I am so glad my husband and I scrimped and saved and got ourselves crammed into this tiny little house we could afford, so that our tax dollars could help others live in $600,000 homes without having to sacrifice the way we did. (/sarcasm)

2008 July 23

[...] in the news these days are those folks who cannot afford housing. The proportion of families who spend more than 35% of income on housing has quadrupled in a single [...]

Pingback
2008 August 19

[...] I’ll just say upfront that I’m not a fan of the Act. I personally don’t think that it’s good policy for a lot of reasons. Primarily, I am not keen on bailing out an industry that dug its own grave. [...]

Pingback

Leave A Comment

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS