Dialing Up Trouble: IRS Tries to Enforce Cell Phone Fringe Benefits

Cell phones are changing the world. A few years ago, I called my mother in the afternoon on my cell phone – to my carrier, a minute was a minute no matter when you called. I remember vividly my mother’s response.

“It must be nice,” she said, “to be so rich that you can call in the middle of the day.”

My mother and the IRS were, at the time, operating with the same outdated information. At least my mother has gotten up to speed – she now has a cell phone and occasionally, even reads a text message from me (Mom, the phone does have a “reply” feature – just saying).

But the IRS? Different story.

According to the Los Angeles times, the IRS has decided to enforce a rule from 1989 that requires that employers that hand out cell phones to their employees report the cell phones as a taxable benefit. The same law requires employees to keep detailed records of all calls made on cell phones issued by employers which indicate which calls are business and which calls are personal.

Oh yeah, cause that’s efficient (insert proper amount of sarcasm here).

Nationwide, about 5.5 million people have cell phone service paid for directly by their employers. That’s a lot of fringe benefit as far as the IRS is concerned.

What the IRS doesn’t seem to grasp is the relatively limited value of the phones – and the costs per minute of cell calls. The average cost per minute that most employees use is relatively minimal compared to the total use of the phone. And yet the IRS still insists on enforcing this outdated and irrational rule.

Who gets it? Brace yourself… Apparently Congress. Congress is currently considering a bill to removing cellphones from the IRS list of fringe benefits. The bipartisan sponsored litigation passed the House earlier this year and a similar bipartisan bill, this one sponsored by Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) and Sen. John Ensign (R-NV), is pending in the Senate.

Rep. Sam Johnson (R-TX), who along with Rep. Earl Pomeroy (D-ND), sponsored the House bill may have said my favorite tax quote of the year. He claims that the rule is outdated and unreasonable, saying about cell phones:

Nowadays they’re a dime a dozen and the cost is way down. If you don’t log all your telephone calls, you’re going to have some IRS weenie after you. That’s why we’re trying to get the law changed — because it just doesn’t make any sense anymore.

Ah, logic. And the use of the word “weenie” by a Representative. It makes the tax world worthwhile.

The bill is expected to pass – though you might want to give your Senators a nudge.

Eliminating the tax would result in some lost revenue. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that it would cost the federal government $237 million in lost revenue over the next 10 years – or approximately 1/3 the amount that we spend in one day in Iraq.

From an administrative perspective, the costs that are saved by the IRS and the employers to keep track of this mess have to be significant. And if it doesn’t pass – but the IRS decides to chase the employers anyway – who really stands to lose? Think about it… do you really think that companies are going to take away employee phones? Of course not. They’ll just take the tax hit. And who will they pass along that hit to? Yep, that’s right. You and me.

Comments

  1. Pingback: ChangeForge | by Ken Stewart | You are welcome to change… » IRS Wants to Tax Your Use of Corporate Mobile Plans

  2. Jean Murray

    My employer figured this out a couple of years ago. Those of us who had company-paid cell phones got to keep our phones, and the company gave us $25 a month (taxable, of course). But we pay the cost of having the phone, so the company doesn’t have to pay for all the calls.
    The biggest problem is that most of us have only one cell phone (who can keep track of two?) so we mix business and personal calls.
    That was their “solution.” But it’s still a mess.

  3. Kelly

    Jean –
    That was more or less what the UC system (they’re the ones who made news with this story) was proposing as a solution – two of the universities got smacked with a HUGE tax bill.
    The problem is that the universities are so huge that it was administratively kind of nightmarish. I think they’re in “wait and see” mode to see what happens with this bill.

  4. suz

    Gee…I had no idea that being available and connected (and expected to be so) was considered a ‘benefit’ to me. I thought it was a drain on my personal time…

  5. Kelly

    suz –
    That’s actually a big consideration – there’s not an “off time” for lots of employees these days.

  6. Kelly

    I don’t know the bill number but the name is “MOBILE Cell Phone Act of 2008”

  7. Pingback: ChangeForge | by Ken Stewart | You are welcome to change… » From the Office of Senator DeMint (SC)

  8. Pingback: Cell Phone Tax Continues to Generate Publicity

  9. Pingback: IRS Talks Cell Phones Again | taxgirl

  10. Pingback: Sunday Mailbag: The Edition With All of the Love | taxgirl

  11. James Nikon

    Its nice to have cell phones given by employers but the usage should only be work related. You need to carry two cell phones at the same time for personal use and office use. Would it be ironic to bring along with you couple of cellphones most of the time.

Leave a Comment