Posts tagged as:

April Fool’s Day

It’s Fix the Tax Code Friday!

This week, my post about a national sales tax on online sales was all in jest for April Fool’s Day. But it caught some folks off guard because it really could happen. Proponents say that a national sales tax would increase revenue by taxing consumption rather than income. Critics say that a sales tax is far too regressive and would disproportionately affect the poor.

I want to know what you think.

Today’s Fix the Tax Code Friday question is:

Should the US consider a national sales tax as an alternate method of raising revenue?

{ 21 comments }

In case you missed the not so subtle humor in Thursday’s post (referencing among other things, Dutch cheese), it was an April Fool’s Day joke. I know some people hate them but me, I have that kind of warped sense of humor. If you missed it, you can catch last year’s post here.

{ 2 comments }

iPod.jpg

Despite the Obama administration’s efforts to close the gap between decreasing revenues and increasing expenditures, the federal deficit is expected to soar this year. Congress has been scrambling for ways to find extra dollars and one Congressman believes he’s found a way: tax online music.

It’s no wonder. The number of songs sold online is exploding; early in the year, Apple announced that it had sold more than 6 billion songs on iTunes. Most iTunes are sold for 99 cents each.

The federal proposal would impose a penny tax on all downloaded music in or originating from the US. Ostensibly, this would include all iTunes music since the company is based out of Cupertino, California.

After advising his colleagues to “do the math” (and summoning a page with a calculator), the Congressman noted that, on iTunes music alone, the penny tax would have raised $60 million, roughly the cost of 3 hours worth of funding to AIG (assuming $170 billion bailout over the course of one year).

There was immediate reaction from the music industry, claiming that a tax on music had the potential to suppress sales, including songs with actual merit. As a result of those concerns, an exemption from the tax has been proposed for performers which could prove that either their lyrics or original musical compositions provided “substantial and irreplaceable contributions to the music or art world.”

Performers Britney Spears and Mariah Carey immediately issued statements that they would not seek an exemption. Spears, speaking from her car, said, “I’m just country, y’all. I never meant to do art.” Congress agreed.

Bono, responding to the news, was certain that this was another way that the revenues from his music would avoid taxation. “Wow,” he reacted. “We didn’t even have to move to the Netherlands for this one.” The popular lead singer of the band U2 has faced criticism in recent years for his decision to move the band from Ireland to the Netherlands to avoid paying taxes (he claims that he did it just for the cheese).

Pop icons didn’t rule the day, however. Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) proposed an amendment to the bill which would exempt bluegrass and other folk music from the tax. Holding up his own album, US Senator Robert Byrd: Mountain Fiddler (County, 1978), as an example (I’m not making that up – Google it), Byrd noted that there are some classes of “the people’s music” which are in danger of disappearing. Adding a penny tax to tunes downloaded onto an already expensive iPod could make the music unaffordable, he argued. Senators, who remember (perhaps fondly) Byrd occasionally picking up a fiddle in the chambers were sympathetic to his case, but otherwise unmoved.

Noted Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), exempting bluegrass music could lead the Senate down the slippery slope of having to carve out other exceptions. He said, “If we exempt one class of music, we’d have to exempt others,” pointing out that the Pennsylvania Polka would not have been saved under Sen. Byrd’s exemption. Specter was immediately criticized by conservatives by invoking a song with the lyrics “Gay with laughter happy as can be, They stop to have a beer.”

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) argued that the bill didn’t go far enough. Taking the floor, he denounced online music as just adding to the entire immoral culture of rock and roll, saying:

“Even if this was not a law… I’m afraid I would have a lot of difficulty endorsing an enterprise which is as fraught with genuine peril as I believe this one to be. Besides the liquor and the drugs which always seem to accompany such an event the thing that distresses me even more… is the spiritual corruption that can be involved. These dances and this kind of music can be destructive, and, uh,… I’m afraid you’re going to find most of the people in our community are gonna agree with me on this.”

Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN) stopped DeMint before he could go much further, calling him out for quoting the big Reverend Shaw Moore scene from the movie “Footloose.”

Of course, it was not unexpected that Apple voiced one of the loudest objections to the bill, claiming the company was being unfairly targeted simply for being cool. The company also noted that the penny tax would boost the cost of most iTunes to an even dollar, creating a serious shortage in the virtual “take a penny, leave a penny” jar.

Despite the controversy surrounding the bill, a vote is expected to take place later today, on April 1st, otherwise known as April Fool’s Day. Happy April Fool’s Day!

(Photo courtesy of Sig)

{ 7 comments }

In a surprising move, the IRS has announced that it is considering exempting bloggers from paying income tax on money earned from blogging.

In its proposed regulations on the matter, the IRS pointed out that bloggers provide a valuable public service by making information available to the public for free. In some instances, this includes lurid details of the lives of politicians or photos of celebrities in distress that the public would otherwise have to pay for. This, the IRS noted, is akin to providing a charitable service.

“Besides,” the IRS stated, “Bloggers don’t make any money anyway, noting that in that regard they are almost acting like a charity by writing for free.”

Responding to criticisms that some bloggers actually do profit from their craft, notably Darren Rowse of Problogger who is rumored to be worth several billion dollars and has been photographed – more than once – lunching with Donald Trump, the IRS acknowledged that there were flaws in the proposed plan. However, the IRS is quick to point out that Problogger fan’s fervor over Rowse’s message is reminiscent of how a church congregation responds to their minister, leaving open the door that there may be a special “Blogging Religion” exemption for what the IRS Commissioner has labeled “super blogs.” Other blogs that might qualify for that special exemption are Copyblogger, Successful Blog and Pitt Watch. While the latter did raise eyebrows, the IRS pointed to traffic patterns on the site which suggest that there are a number of avid Pitt fans who visit the site more than one time per day – including the Content Manager at a top blogging network. “This woman is visibly moved by Brad Pitt news – how is that different from a church sermon? It is her Xanadu.”

The IRS went on to outline how bloggers might otherwise meet the “charitable, educational and religious” criteria required by the IRS for tax exempt status. In almost every scenario, bloggers fit the pattern of providing services to the public in a manner that could be described as charitable – except for Rosie O’Donnell’s blog which agents copped to merely finding confusing.

The IRS admits that the proposed legislation is a little out of the ordinary. It is, however, part of the IRS’ ongoing plan to portray itself as progressive, technologically advanced and in tune with the needs of taxpayers – they’ve even launched a YouTube campaign to reach taxpayers with questions about rebate checks.

At a press conference, the acting IRS commish announced, “It’s all part of our strategy to bring the IRS into the 20th century.”

When reminded that it was the 21st century, the IRS said simply, “Exactly.”

*** Happy April Fool’s Day!

{ 21 comments }