Posts tagged as:

football

vick.jpg

In just a little under three hours, the Philadelphia Eagles will hit the field for the third of their four pre-season games. So far, they’ve given their fans nothing to cheer about. They have, however, given them plenty to talk about – not the least of which is the signing of former bad boy (and felon) Michael Vick.

Michael Vick, who pleaded guilty to “Conspiracy to Travel in Interstate Commerce in Aid of Unlawful Activities and to Sponsor a Dog in an Animal Fighting Venture”, is set to make his Eagles debut tonight against the Jacksonville Jaguars. The debut follows a conditional reinstatement for Vick by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell.

Several teams expressed interest in Vick who had made quite a splash in the NFL during his early tenure. He still holds records for the most rushing yards by a quarterback in a single season (1,039 in 2006), highest average per carry in a single season (8.45 in 2006), 100-yard career rushing games by a quarterback (eight), best two-game rushing total (225 in 2004) and rushing yards in a single game (173 in 2002). But in a move that stunned almost everybody (including this Eagles fan), the Philadelphia Eagles signed Vick to a 2 year contract. Yeah, I thought he was going to the Steelers, too.

As it turns out, it’s a move that the Eagles could have received some tax benefits for… The Eagles could have recuperated some of the $1.6 million contract with Vick via a $10,000 tax credit offered to employers by the Mayor’s Office for Re-entry of Ex-Offenders (MORE). The credit was added to the existing program (which includes opportunities for education and job training) to encourage businesses to hire ex-offenders. So far, reportedly only six businesses have taken advantage of the credit. Would the Philadelphia Eagles be lucky #7 (ironic, since that’s Vick’s Falcons number)? Not this time. A team spokesperson told the Philadelphia Daily News that wasn’t going to happen.

But the move has put a new emphasis on the tax credit. According to the Mayor’s Office, there are approximately 298,400 adults living in Philadelphia who have a criminal background and who are technically ex-offenders. That’s more than a quarter of a million people. A quarter million potential employees. A quarter millions potential taxpayers. A quarter million potential actual contributing members of society.

Or we could just continue to pump money into the prison system by choosing to pretend that it’s not a problem (approximately 40% of offenders go back to jail, as high as 70% in California).

Philadelphia is opting for the former and choosing to believe in second chances – in more ways than one. Statistics suggest that ex-offenders with sustainable jobs remain ex-offenders, a finding that isn’t lost outside of Philadelphia. Kansas, Illinois and Iowa are just a few of the states that offer similar programs. The feds also offer an incentive in the form of a Work Opportunity Tax Credit. A business which hires a qualified ex-felon (defined as “an individual who has been convicted of a felony and has a hiring date which is not more than one year after the last date on which he was so convicted or released from prison”) may be entitled to a federal tax credit in the amount of $2400. Other target groups, including disabled vets, are also included in the program. George W. Bush re-authorized the bill in 2006 and expanded in 2007, once remarking, “America is the land of the second chance – and when the gates of the prison open, the path ahead should lead to a better life.”

While the Eagles take a pass on this tax break, maybe other local employees will give it a second look.

But for tonight, are you ready for some football?

Hat Tip: @jmnaylor via Twitter

(Image by Keith Allison from Baltimore, USA under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0 License)

Technorati Tags:
, ,

{ 2 comments }

Pittsburgh_Steelers.jpgWhen it comes to football, Pennsylvanians are pretty hard core. From the Steelers to the Eagles, NFL football makes headline after headline in the fall. Also in the state, we have a little college football team called Penn State that seems to do pretty well from time to time. I think it’s fair to say that the state is passionate about football.

Rep. Rep. Daryl Metcalfe (R-Cranberry) wants to see a little of that heart when it comes to talking taxes. On Tuesday, June 9, representatives from the National Taxpayers Union, Americans for Tax Reform, Citizens Against Higher Taxes and the National Federation of Independent Business will speak at a rally in the rotunda at the Capitol Building at 10 a.m. Metcalfe is hopeful that taxpayers turn out, too. He noted that record numbers of citizens showed up to watch Pittsburgh take home another Super Bowl tropy, and encouraged a similar level of participation: “Ten percent of the people who showed up to see the Steelers win the Super Bowl — if they would descend on the Capitol, it would be historic for this building.”

Metcalfe has a good point. Whether you agree with Governor Rendell (who claims that an income tax increase of .3% is needed to close the state’s $3.2 billion deficit) or Senate Republicans (who argue that a tax increase isn’t necessary and was Rendell’s plan all along), participation in the process is important. It’s easy to yell and scream about taxes – but how much do you really care about it? If you’ll yell and scream about football, why not a tax increase?

Folks will stand in the freezing cold to watch a mediocre team lose as much as they will to watch a good team win. They’ll drive hours to see games and players and spend tons of money on jerseys, pennants and posters. They’ll organize entire day-long tailgating events and invite friends and family over for parties and dinners – all to watch the “big game” and in football parlance, that’s more or less every game.

But what about taxes?

Hey, I’m not claiming that talking about taxes is necessarily as fun as attending a Super Bowl party but it’s arguably more important to your life (assuming, of course, that you’re not Ben Roethlisberger). Why not show a little – and I’m talking just a little – excitement when it comes to tax policy? Write a letter to your local representative (or to the editor of your local newspaper). Attend a rally. Read the budget. Get educated. Don’t think it won’t make a difference. It will. Lots of what goes on “behind the scenes” happens because nobody cared enough to say differently.

Show that you care about where your tax dollars go.

Statistically, people have a negative reaction when it comes to increasing the income tax rate. But apparently it’s more along the lines of a shrug than a full on “Booo!” And heck, I live in Philadelphia. We’ll boo just about anything. Why not taxes?

Do you think the Steelers and Eagles would show up every game and play if the stadiums were empty? Let me clue you in: they wouldn’t. Cheering matters.

So here’s my advice – and it’s not just for Pennsylvania. Let your legislators know how you feel. If they’re doing the right thing, why not shake a pom-pom in their direction? And if they’re not doing the right thing, give them an “encouraging cheer” in the right direction or flat out “boo” them loudly. Show that you care as much about taxes as you do about football. And since I realize that’s just not possible for some of you (you know who I’m talking about, PSU people), at least make the effort.

Image courtesy of Creative Commons, taken by Steel City Hobbies.

{ 5 comments }

This Just In…

November 29, 2007 · 4 comments

Penn State University has released the official salary of Joe Paterno and the news is BIG. Really BIG.

And why? Because it’s… get this… $512,664.

No missing digits here.

The provost at the University of Alabama should be weeping by now. And the folks at the University of South Carolina should demand a refund from Spurrier (if, for no other reason, than the fact that their team sucks this year – sorry, Rob!).

Now, I’m not sure what other kind of compensation JoePa gets. But I don’t care. Before I moved to Pennsylvania, I thought that Penn State was a motor oil (long story, I’m from ACC country). But I have much admiration for the positive press that Joe Paterno has brought to the university – for a mere half million a year.

Yes, it’s a lot for coaching, relatively speaking. But it pales in comparison to the monster coaching salaries at other universities.

Maybe Paterno and the rest of the Nittany Lions actually remember that the “U” stands for university. As in education. And not training camp for pro ball.

—-
Psst, if you enjoyed this article, can you digg it? Click below:

digg_url = ‘http://www.digg.com/football/JoePa_s_salary_made_public’;

{ 4 comments }

Pay to Play

November 21, 2007 · 0 comments

150px-Joe_Paterno_Sideline_PSU-Illinois_2006.jpg

One of the most closely guarded secrets in the history of sports is about to be revealed: exactly how much does JoePa get paid?

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that the Penn State University football coach’s salary must be made public. The request had initially been made by a newspaper (The Patriot-News in Harrisburg) to the State Employees’ Retirement System; employees enrolled in the system are covered by an open records law. The university had previously blocked attempts to make Paterno’s salary public.

Speculations run rampant about exactly how much Joe Paterno is paid for his role as head coach at Penn State University. He holds more bowl victories than any coach in history. He has won each of the major bowls, the Rose, Orange, Fiesta and Sugar Bowls, at least once.

Those numbers put him in a class all by himself – will it be reflected in his salary? And more importantly, what does it have to do with tax?

Plenty. As I reported previously, salaries for coaching collegiate sports outpace the salaries of college faculty. And the trend is continuing: the University of Alabama agreed to pay Nick Saban $4 million per year to coach their football team. In comparison, the average UA professor makes $108,000 and the average UA associate professor makes just under $75,000 (source – pdf). That’s a pretty wide discrepancy. And it’s worth noting that UA didn’t even crack the top 25 of the BCS for November.

Colleges are increasingly devoting more and more of their resources to raising money through sports programs, since sports programs bring in astounding amounts of revenue. Those schools are, however, not paying tax on this money – ostensibly from entertainment revenue and not related to the college’s primary purpose (education) because most colleges and universities are de facto tax exempt.

Congress has conducted a ridiculously half-hearted inquiry into the tax exempt status of colleges and universities in light of accusations that these institutions are not using funds for education and are instead focusing on paying coaches, building stadiums and selling tickets. Critics have focused on the frenzy to collect dollars on the backs of student athletes, when many of student-athletes in top programs perform poorly in an academic setting; in that regard, those critics argue, NCAA sports programs are little more than pro-sport training camps. So far, no decision has been reached by Congress or the IRS with respect to the inquiry.

If Paterno’s salary is as high as some speculate (numbers that have been bandied about go as high as $5 million per year in straight salary, not including perks), it may well accelerate the inquiry into coaching salaries and the tax exempt status of the NCAA and educational institutions. Of course, it could be revealed that he was paid $20 million per year and no one would really care until the end of January. It is, after all, bowl season.

{ 0 comments }

The Shill of the Game

14 October 2007

No, that’s not a typo. These days, it seems, it is all about the dollars. Even in college sports – or maybe especially in college sports.
The headline on this week’s Philadelphia Inquirer, Sunday Edition, blared “Raising Funds – and eyebrows” – the story about the push to raise money for colleges through athletics made the [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

NCAA: Ball Is In IRS’ Court

22 November 2006

NCAA President Myles Brand has (finally) responded to the ongoing inquiry into the tax-exempt status of the organization in a 25 page letter posted on the organization’s web site.  The response initially had an October deadline – I guess somebody forgot to tell the folks in Committee that it’s college football season.  You can’t expect [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

The Price You Pay.

19 November 2006

Following up on my recent post about the NCAA, college sports and tax-exempt status, take a look at  this tidbit in USA Today which reports college coach salaries.
I’ll bet Jim Tressel thinks his approximately $500k advantage over Lloyd Carr is worth it following this weekend’s Ohio State-Michigan game…  Of course, that begs the question, why [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Football mania

26 October 2006

Back in February, Madeline authored an interesting post about the tax implications of college football. Not to be outdone at the beginning of football season, DevilGrad followed up on an inquiry by some Congressional officials into the tax-exempt status of college sports. It seems, these days, that as the popularity of college sports grows, so, [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Are You Ready for Some Football?

6 October 2006

Madeline had previously posted an interesting query about the economics and tax implications of (gulp) college football.  It’s worth another look in light of this recent post by DevilGrad on a similar issue.  There’s even more analysis here.
The real question at issue is "Why is a multi-million dollar business, which is not effectively related to [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

A Free Ride?

16 February 2006

Guest Blogger: Madeline M. Martin

As almost anyone who knows me can attest, I am a college football fanatic. This time of year I usually focus my attention on recruiting. This month, February, is when high school seniors can formally commit.
It was recently reported throughout the sports media that Texas A&M recruit, Terrence [...]

0 comments Read the full article →