Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • Taxgirl Goes To The Movies: Star Wars
  • Looking For Tax Breaks?
  • Taxgirl Goes Back To The Movies In 2025
  • Here’s What You Need To Know About Submitting Tax Questions
  • Looking For More Great Tax Content?

Most Used Categories

  • individual (1,314)
  • politics (862)
  • IRS news/announcements (753)
  • tax policy (582)
  • ask the taxgirl (543)
  • prosecutions, felonies and misdemeanors (479)
  • just for fun (478)
  • state & local (403)
  • pop culture (399)
  • charitable organizations (389)
Skip to content

Taxgirl

Because paying taxes is painful… but reading about them shouldn’t be.

  • About Taxgirl
  • Info
    • My Disclaimer
    • A Word (or More) About Your Privacy
    • Subscribe
  • Ask The Taxgirl
  • Comments
  • Taxgirl Podcast
    • Podcast Season 1
    • Podcast Season 2
    • Podcast Season 3
  • Contact
  • Home
  • 2006
  • May
  • 1
  • IRS Continues To Probe Money-laundering

IRS Continues To Probe Money-laundering

Kelly Phillips ErbMay 1, 2006November 14, 2019

Well, only if you live in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming and Puerto Rico.

The Service announced that those 33 states and Puerto Rico have reached an agreement with IRS to begin sharing Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) information. This will allow the IRS and the participating states to share information to ensure that money services businesses (MSBs), non-bank financial institutions that provide financial services such as currency exchangers, check cashers, issuers of traveler’s checks or stored value cards, and money transmitters, are complying with federal and
state responsibilities to register with the government and report cash transactions and suspicious activities.

Colorado, Hawaii, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico and Montana did not sign such an agreement since either state law prohibits them from doing so or they do not regulate the industry.

The information the IRS and the states may share under these agreements is limited to Bank Secrecy Act examination information and not personal tax information.

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
author avatar
Kelly Phillips Erb
Kelly Phillips Erb is a tax attorney, tax writer, and podcaster.
See Full Bio
social network icon social network icon
Bank-Secrecy-Act

Post navigation

Previous: Philadelphia Tax Amnesty To End Soon
Next: Oh Anna!

Related Posts

IRS Releases ETAAC Recommendations to Congress 

July 5, 2024July 5, 2024 Kelly Phillips Erb
mansion

LA Times Mention In Mansion Tax Story

June 15, 2023 Kelly Phillips Erb
Open Sign

Tax Season Opens on January 23—And Taxpayers Have More Time to File

January 12, 2023January 12, 2023 Kelly Phillips Erb

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2005-2022, Kelly Phillips Erb | Theme: BlockWP by Candid Themes.
Skip to content
Open toolbar Accessibility Tools

Accessibility Tools

  • Increase TextIncrease Text
  • Decrease TextDecrease Text
  • GrayscaleGrayscale
  • High ContrastHigh Contrast
  • Negative ContrastNegative Contrast
  • Light BackgroundLight Background
  • Links UnderlineLinks Underline
  • Readable FontReadable Font
  • Reset Reset
  • SitemapSitemap
  • FeedbackFeedback