Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • Taxgirl Goes To The Movies: Star Wars
  • Looking For Tax Breaks?
  • Taxgirl Goes Back To The Movies In 2025
  • Here’s What You Need To Know About Submitting Tax Questions
  • Looking For More Great Tax Content?

Most Used Categories

  • individual (1,314)
  • politics (862)
  • IRS news/announcements (753)
  • tax policy (582)
  • ask the taxgirl (543)
  • prosecutions, felonies and misdemeanors (479)
  • just for fun (478)
  • state & local (403)
  • pop culture (399)
  • charitable organizations (389)
Skip to content

Taxgirl

Because paying taxes is painful… but reading about them shouldn’t be.

  • About Taxgirl
  • Info
    • My Disclaimer
    • A Word (or More) About Your Privacy
    • Subscribe
  • Ask The Taxgirl
  • Comments
  • Taxgirl Podcast
    • Podcast Season 1
    • Podcast Season 2
    • Podcast Season 3
  • Contact
  • Home
  • 2009
  • August
  • 4
  • Tata Loses Suit To Compel Arbitration In Mumbai

Tata Loses Suit To Compel Arbitration In Mumbai

Kelly Phillips ErbAugust 4, 2009May 17, 2020

Tata may be the biggest company that you’ve never heard of. The car manufacturer, which holds the distinction of having built the cheapest car ever, the Tata Nano, is India’s largest company in the automobile and commercial vehicle sector. In 2007, it was one of the top 20 largest automakers worldwide and was ranked globally as the second-largest manufacturer of commercial vehicles. And in 2008, it acquired the British Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) business from Ford.

Tata is making news in the US more for its business practices than for its business. This week, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the motion of Tata to compel its employees to arbitration in India, rather than in California where the claims were raised. Tata was also unsuccessful in an attempt to dismiss a nationwide class-action lawsuit filed by its employees.

At issue in the lawsuit are claims that overtime was not paid, claiming that they were exempt. The lawsuit also alleges that Tata required its non-U.S.-citizen employees to sign Powers of Attorney for the purposes of filing tax returns with a designated third party and requiring those employees to endorse and sign over their federal and state tax refund checks to the company.

More information about the allegations will, I’m sure, become available as the case moves to trial.

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
author avatar
Kelly Phillips Erb
Kelly Phillips Erb is a tax attorney, tax writer, and podcaster.
See Full Bio
social network icon social network icon
India, Tata

Post navigation

Previous: Tax Revenues Lowest Since Depression
Next: Ask The Taxgirl: Same-Sex Couples & The Homebuyer’s Credit

Related Posts

What CEOs Think About The Economy and New Challenges Ahead

March 8, 2022March 8, 2022 John Luckenbaugh

The OECD Global Minimum Tax Deal: What to Expect

January 11, 2022January 25, 2022 John Luckenbaugh
financial crime

Fighting Financial Crime with More Transparency after Panama Papers Drama

December 21, 2021January 5, 2022 John Luckenbaugh

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2005-2022, Kelly Phillips Erb | Theme: BlockWP by Candid Themes.
Skip to content
Open toolbar Accessibility Tools

Accessibility Tools

  • Increase TextIncrease Text
  • Decrease TextDecrease Text
  • GrayscaleGrayscale
  • High ContrastHigh Contrast
  • Negative ContrastNegative Contrast
  • Light BackgroundLight Background
  • Links UnderlineLinks Underline
  • Readable FontReadable Font
  • Reset Reset
  • SitemapSitemap
  • FeedbackFeedback