Skip to content

Recent Posts

  • Taxgirl Goes To The Movies: Star Wars
  • Looking For Tax Breaks?
  • Taxgirl Goes Back To The Movies In 2025
  • Here’s What You Need To Know About Submitting Tax Questions
  • Looking For More Great Tax Content?

Most Used Categories

  • individual (1,314)
  • politics (862)
  • IRS news/announcements (753)
  • tax policy (582)
  • ask the taxgirl (543)
  • prosecutions, felonies and misdemeanors (479)
  • just for fun (478)
  • state & local (403)
  • pop culture (399)
  • charitable organizations (389)
Skip to content

Taxgirl

Because paying taxes is painful… but reading about them shouldn’t be.

  • About Taxgirl
  • Info
    • My Disclaimer
    • A Word (or More) About Your Privacy
    • Subscribe
  • Ask The Taxgirl
  • Comments
  • Taxgirl Podcast
    • Podcast Season 1
    • Podcast Season 2
    • Podcast Season 3
  • Contact
  • Home
  • 2008
  • July
  • 5
  • Pringles Successfully Argues That Their Snacks Are Not Potato Chips

Pringles Successfully Argues That Their Snacks Are Not Potato Chips

Kelly Phillips ErbJuly 5, 2008

A court in London has ruled that Pringles, the iconic snacks in the ubiquitous red tube, are not potato chips.

Really.

Apparently, there are not enough potatoes in Pringles to have them legally qualify as “potato chips” or “potato crisps.” That matters to the tax office because, in the UK, most food is exempt from a steep 17.5% sales tax. The taxing authorities, however, claimed that Pringles fell under an exception for potato chips, sticks or puffs and “similar products made from the potato, or from potato flour, or from potato starch.”

Procter & Gamble, Pringles parent company, said no. The company claimed that Pringles are not made like potato chips since they are cooked from baked dough and not slices of potato; in fact, Pringles are just 42% potato. Additionally, Pringles have a shelf life of 15 months, versus four months for potato crisps – chew on that for a bit.

The company further argued that potato chips “give a sharply crunchy sensation under the tooth and have to be broken down into jagged pieces when chewed,” while Pringles are “designed to melt down on the tongue.”

The courts agreed: Pringles is not made largely from potatoes, does not look, feel or taste like a potato chip and is, therefore, tax-exempt.

I’m not quite sure what kind of victory that is, really. Pringles “wins” because it proved that it’s not the product that it markets itself as… Or does it? On the Pringles website, Pringles is consistently referred to as a snack – and not as potato chips. And now, legally, a Pringles chip has been ruled as something (I’m not sure what) other than a potato chip. My four-year-old however, begs to differ: just this morning, she declared them “potato chips.” I think I just discovered the secret to the UK Tax Office’s appeal…

(Hat Tip: TaxProf Blog)

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail
author avatar
Kelly Phillips Erb
Kelly Phillips Erb is a tax attorney, tax writer, and podcaster.
See Full Bio
social network icon social network icon
tax, UK

Post navigation

Previous: Crocodile Dundee Actor Investigated On Two Continents
Next: Psst, BlogHer Is Sold Out

Related Posts

What CEOs Think About The Economy and New Challenges Ahead

March 8, 2022March 8, 2022 John Luckenbaugh

The OECD Global Minimum Tax Deal: What to Expect

January 11, 2022January 25, 2022 John Luckenbaugh
financial crime

Fighting Financial Crime with More Transparency after Panama Papers Drama

December 21, 2021January 5, 2022 John Luckenbaugh

5 thoughts on “Pringles Successfully Argues That Their Snacks Are Not Potato Chips”

  1. Keith says:
    July 5, 2008 at 7:02 pm

    I just wish I could do something similar with my house here in the states. What else could I call it besides a house and not have to pay property taxes on it

    Reply
  2. Jennifer Gniadecki says:
    July 6, 2008 at 12:53 pm

    Amazing. Just amazing.

    Did they prove the “snacks” are food, then? Or did they prove they are not chips and not food?

    Will they be moved to the same aisle of the store as the WD-40? LOL

    Reply
  3. Chris Coyle says:
    July 8, 2008 at 7:05 pm

    When Pringles were originally introduced nationwide in the early 70s, they were challenged by traditional “potato chip” makers as not being pototo chips. Hence, they were forced to advertise the product as potato crisps. (Thank you Food Network)

    Apparently, they’re just crisps now.

    Reply
  4. Jennifer Vanderhook says:
    November 7, 2020 at 4:13 pm

    I see this is an old post but I must say that if you ever have a mouth without teeth then you most definitely would agree that Pringles are not like a potato chip. Potato chips are really hard and rough. Even when crunched up in to crumbs they will still scratch the heck out of your mouth. But Pringles on the other hand are much easier on your mouth because they are a mixture of potatoes and flour as well as other ingredients mixed in to a dough then rolled out and shaped in to a “chip” or an oval shape ,.then baked. Therefore when you eat them they crumble in your mouth allowing a person without teeth or lack of teeth to comfortably Chew them up and enjoy them without cutting up their mouth like you typical Potato Chip. A potato chip is simply a slice of potato thinly cut then fried or baked as it is. So I agree they are no Potato Chip. And if you ever can’t chew you most likely will agree they definitely are not potato chips…And incase you couldn’t tell a funyon is not an onion. I mean seriously have you ever wanted a Pringles? They are not like potato chips. I honestly don’t even see where the confusion comes from. So I definitely consider it a win on Procter & Gamble’s side because they are a mixture of ingredients which include potato that are “processed” and shaped. Oh and Veggie Straws are also mixtures of vegetables and flour, and processed so don’t freak out when you learn they are not all veggie. What a joke to even waste the courts time with a lawsuit in the first place…

    Reply
    1. Bill says:
      January 23, 2024 at 2:46 pm

      By the time you posted this, Procter & Gamble wasn’t who makes Pringles anymore, it was Kellogg’s who makes Pringles (in 2023, they split into two separate companies, the snacks (which Pringles falls under) became part of a company called Kellanova and the cereals became part of a company called the the W.K. Kellogg Company, so now it’s Kellanova who makes Pringles.)

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2005-2022, Kelly Phillips Erb | Theme: BlockWP by Candid Themes.
Skip to content
Open toolbar Accessibility Tools

Accessibility Tools

  • Increase TextIncrease Text
  • Decrease TextDecrease Text
  • GrayscaleGrayscale
  • High ContrastHigh Contrast
  • Negative ContrastNegative Contrast
  • Light BackgroundLight Background
  • Links UnderlineLinks Underline
  • Readable FontReadable Font
  • Reset Reset
  • SitemapSitemap
  • FeedbackFeedback