On Sunday, I found myself in a minivan (don’t ask) with the rest of my family driving down to coastal North Carolina for a mini-break (yes, the minis are taking over my life… now for that darn Mini Cooper and I’m set!).
I was mulling what I might post about during my vacation because I didn’t want to leaving you hanging (how would you survive without your tax posts?) and because I didn’t want to do something cheesy in the interim. I thought about tax trivia, tax history (since I’m working on a book), tax profiles… Nothing seemed to work. And then, as I sped down Highway 17, I saw a number of signs that formed the basis for my series this week. They said, simply, “Say No to Incorporation.”
I grew up in a little town in southeastern North Carolina called Hampstead, NC. We were, proudly, the Seafood Capital of the Carolinas. There was, however, little else that passed through our town. We were a spot on the map. We did not even have a stoplight – we got one when I was in high school, the photo appears in our high school yearbook.
Even then, in the early 1980s, there were debates about the merits of incorporation. The locals feared what it meant but as more and more growth happened in our town, the argument picked up speed. Ogden, just down the road, had already been swallowed by Wilmington – were we next?
For years, the argument came and went. Nothing ever happened.
But now, the argument has once again gathered momentum. Hampstead is no longer the sleepy little town that it used to be. Some might argue that’s for the good. Some might argue… well, you get the idea.
Whereas once the argument was relegated to grocery store parking lots and the Chamber of Commerce, it is now out in the open. Signs proliferate not only along the highway, but spotted through neighborhoods. It is on the hearts and minds of many in the town.
I asked my mom what had changed, what was compelling folks to take up this argument now. She gave me some of the older arguments (fear of being eaten to the south by Wilmington, to the north by Surf City) but then she mentioned something that gave me my *aha* moment: double taxation. You see, folks in Hampstead don’t actually pay local taxes, just county taxes. But our county, Pender, is quite large. Most of the wealth in Pender is concentrated on the eastern part of the county, near the coast, near, you guessed it, Hampstead.
Back in the day, Hampstead had to rely solely on Burgaw (our county seat in Pender County) for all of our services – from police to EMT to sanitation (such as it was). As the town grows, many residents aren’t thrilled with the level of services provided – they think they could do better on their own. Burgaw, as you can imagine, isn’t excited thrilled at the notion of losing out on tax dollars. Even though they don’t necessarily provide the equivalent amount of services to the eastern part of the county, taxes collected in this part of the county are divvied up and used throughout the county. Some would argue that this is to Hampstead’s detriment – they pay dollars that Burgaw spends for services in other places. What’s a town to do? Could they perhaps incorporate and be responsible for their own tax collection and their own services? Maybe.
So a large part of this argument boils down to taxes. And this I get. I hear it in Philadelphia all of the time. Even though Philadelphia and Hampstead are worlds apart on a number of levels, they share similar concerns about taxation, apportionment and services. The question that many taxpayers ask is: “Is it fair to pay for the services of others?”
I’ve asked this question in a slightly different context before – with respect to bailing out lenders of subprime mortgages – but the policy piece is very similar. Our tax system has, over time, become the conduit for “sharing the wealth” to provide services for all people regardless of concentration of wealth or services. And I’m curious as to what you think about this… is it fair?
My plan, over the next few days, is to gather some opinions here in southeastern North Carolina for and opposed to incorporation in Hampstead. I’m not interested in the political arguments, just the tax policy pieces. I’ll let you know what I find out. In the interim, let me know what you think: should tax dollars only be spent on the persons who pay them? Is there a place for government in the provision of services? Would (gasp) privatization be a better answer?
I think Hampstead needs to be a town. There is such a thing as what is better for the community as a whole. I do not like taxes either but when your only child and grandchild are killed on hwy. 17 by a person going “normal speed” you tend to not think about what money you have to spend for the safety and betterment of people in our community.