iPhone, uTax?

2007 June 29

Working at Apple just got a little sweeter, it seems.

Apple has announced that it is giving free iPhones to all 18,000 of its employees, at a cost of over $10 million to the company. Each of the models is worth about $600.

Cool, right?

The new phones are set to be distributed to employees at the end of July. Eager employees will no doubt immediately start using their new toys and won’t give it another thought until… January 2008. That’s when they’ll receive their form W-2 which, if Apple does the right thing, will include the price of the iPhone as compensation.

Oh yeah, no matter how Steve Jobs announces the distribution of iPhone, it’s not a gift. It’s compensation. In almost every situation, a gift from employer to employee - no matter how well meaning - is not considered a gift. While the IRS is content to look away at gifts that are considered de minimis, an iPhone clearly doesn’t fall under that category. It’s the hottest tech item this summer - and it’s not cheap. The IRS will no doubt consider the “gifts” taxable to the employees - which means that the cost to Apple also just went up a little bit (Apple has to cough up the FICA match). While Apple has not yet announced its position on distributing iPhones to its independent contractors, I think that the tax considerations (not to mention the availability of the iPhone for paying customers) may help them along with that decision.

Just as Microsoft recently learned that there’s no such thing as a free lunch with the launch of Vista/Office promo, Apple will no doubt learn its lesson. A good rule of thumb: An apple (or fruit basket) to an employee? Free. An Apple iPhone? Not so much.

(Like this story? You can digg it here.)

No Comments leave one →
2007 June 29

[...] Read More… Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]

Pingback
2007 June 30

[...] Link to Article steve jobs iPhone, uTax? » Posted at taxgirl on Friday, June 29, 2007 [...]

Pingback
2007 June 30

[...] Link to Article apple iphone iPhone, uTax? » Posted at taxgirl on Friday, June 29, 2007 [...]

Pingback
2007 June 30

[...] iPhone, uTax? Working at Apple just got a little sweeter, it seems. Apple has announced that it is giving free … does the right thing, will include the price of the iPhone as compensation. Oh yeah, no matter how Steve Jobs announces the iPhone, it s not a gift. It s compensation. In almost every situation [...]

Pingback
2007 July 1

Interesting information, Kelly, for businesses that decide to give gifts…and the employees who receive them.

2007 July 1

[...] at Taxgirl, brought up an interesting point in her post, iPhone,uTax, concerning gifts from businesses to employees.  She connected this information with Apple giving [...]

Pingback
2007 July 2

[...] Steve Jobs has announced that Apple employees will receive a high end version of the iPhone at the end of July. Cool, right? Did he happen to tell them that they’ll be taxed on it? Kelly at taxgirl.com explains why, in this case, a gift really isn’t a gift. [...]

Pingback
2007 July 2

[...] Taxgirl.com breaks it to Apple employees the iPhone Steve Jobs gave’m is a gift that really isn’t a gift. [...]

Pingback
2007 July 10
ryan

every time apple gives something to its employees, it takes care off all the tax liability with a special non-taxable info line item on the paycheck. This isn’t the first time.

2007 July 10

Ryan -
If you’re saying that in the past, Apple has noted a “de minimis” gift on a paycheck for purposes of record-keeping, that’s cool.
But Apple cannot simply wipe away the taxable nature of this gift (and it is taxable) with a line item on a paycheck.

2007 July 31

[...] But when it comes to income, assuming that Billy Ray is being paid a salary, which is taxable, he would also have to consider the source of his other trappings. And this is where my analysis gets a little bit hazy. Billy Ray begins to live in Louis’ house. It’s clearly not a gift from Louis - but I’m not sure what it else it would be since that part isn’t really explained in the film. If the home was somehow part of the compensation package of being at the firm, then the fair market value of the perks would be reportable as income. It can’t be a gift from the brothers while he’s an employee; remember that usually, employers can’t make significant non-taxable gifts to employees. [...]

Pingback

Leave A Comment

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS